Recent Blog Posts
-
Nicked Off: The Curious Path of Gawker's Chief
Oct 11 20102:39 pm EDT -
Conde Nast Closing 'Portfolio'
Apr 27 200910:02 am EDT -
Newspaper Circ: 'WSJ' Gains as 'NY Post' Tumbles
Apr 27 20099:32 am EDT -
Idle Chatter: The Prognosis for Newspapers, more
Apr 27 20098:55 am EDT -
Late Breaks: MySpace, NYT, 'New York'
Apr 24 20094:01 pm EDT -
Nostalgia, Entitlement and Murdoch's 'Journal'
Apr 24 20094:00 pm EDT -
Huffpo's Lerer on the 'New and Better' Journalism
Apr 24 200912:44 pm EDT -
Ailes Heats Up Cold Spring with Newspaper War
Apr 24 200912:33 pm EDT -
Happy Friday. Now Watch This.
Apr 24 200910:24 am EDT -
Idle Chatter: NPR Cutbacks, Jon Meacham, more
Apr 24 20098:50 am EDT
Links
- SI.com - Richard Deitsch

- I Want Media

- Editor & Publisher

- Galleycat

- Magazine Death Pool

- WWD's Memo Pad

- Talking Biz News

- Media Nation

- Hollywood Wiretap

- FAIR

- The Media Pundit

- NYT Media

- MediaFile

- Gapper Blog - Media

- Jezebel

- The Business Insider

- Viral Video

- Ad Age

- Newsbusters

- News After Newspapers

- Nikki Finke

- News Hounds

- NY Observer media page

- Valleywag

- Paid Content

- TVNewser

- Nieman Journalism Lab

- Romenesko

- Keith Kelly

- Contact Me

- Cover Awards

- Tyndall Report

- Jon Friedman

- Gawker

- Jon Fine

- Media Shift

- HuffPo Media

Thomson: Readers Dig 'WSJ' Sports Page. Do you?
It's been two weeks and change now since The Wall Street Journal introduced a daily sports page. It's a distinctly odd creation -- heavy on statistical breakdowns and curious factoids but devoid of the usual sports-section trimmings like player profiles, trade stories and game recaps. In a way, it's philosophically more in tune with the pre-Rupert Murdoch Journal, which always had an eye for the quirky, offbeat story, than with the new Journal, which aspires to be a first read.
I asked managing editor Robert Thomson what kind of reception it's gotten from readers. "Overwhelmingly positive," he says. "It's intended to be counter-intuitive and our readers have instinctively understood the complementarity to existing sports coverage. [It] makes more sense to focus on the probability of that night's outcomes, which are a talking point, than to replicate results which are available on the web immediately."
Traffic to the Journal's online sports home, he says, has quadrupled since the page launch, running at 120,000 on peak days. Another indication that the page is finding an audience: "We have had applied mathematicians applying for sports stats assignments."
I'll never been a terribly regular sports-section reader, so I'd be curious to hear from those of you who are: Does the Journal's approach to sports work for you? Or is it too cerebral and over-clever? Email me or post a comment.
Comments
If you are commenting using a Facebook account, your profile information may be displayed with your comment depending on your privacy settings. By leaving the 'Post to Facebook' box selected, your comment will be published to your Facebook profile in addition to the space below.




