Recent Blog Posts
-
Nicked Off: The Curious Path of Gawker's Chief
Oct 11 20102:39 pm EDT -
Conde Nast Closing 'Portfolio'
Apr 27 200910:02 am EDT -
Newspaper Circ: 'WSJ' Gains as 'NY Post' Tumbles
Apr 27 20099:32 am EDT -
Idle Chatter: The Prognosis for Newspapers, more
Apr 27 20098:55 am EDT -
Late Breaks: MySpace, NYT, 'New York'
Apr 24 20094:01 pm EDT -
Nostalgia, Entitlement and Murdoch's 'Journal'
Apr 24 20094:00 pm EDT -
Huffpo's Lerer on the 'New and Better' Journalism
Apr 24 200912:44 pm EDT -
Ailes Heats Up Cold Spring with Newspaper War
Apr 24 200912:33 pm EDT -
Happy Friday. Now Watch This.
Apr 24 200910:24 am EDT -
Idle Chatter: NPR Cutbacks, Jon Meacham, more
Apr 24 20098:50 am EDT
Links
- SI.com - Richard Deitsch

- I Want Media

- Editor & Publisher

- Galleycat

- Magazine Death Pool

- WWD's Memo Pad

- Talking Biz News

- Media Nation

- Hollywood Wiretap

- FAIR

- The Media Pundit

- NYT Media

- MediaFile

- Gapper Blog - Media

- Jezebel

- The Business Insider

- Viral Video

- Ad Age

- Newsbusters

- News After Newspapers

- Nikki Finke

- News Hounds

- NY Observer media page

- Valleywag

- Paid Content

- TVNewser

- Nieman Journalism Lab

- Romenesko

- Keith Kelly

- Contact Me

- Cover Awards

- Tyndall Report

- Jon Friedman

- Gawker

- Jon Fine

- Media Shift

- HuffPo Media

'NYT' Digital Czar: News Cooperative's a Possibility
If David Carr's pie-in-the-sky scenario of newspapers banding together to save themselves -- and anti-trust laws be damned -- were become reality, it would without a doubt require the support of the industry's most influential player: Carr's own New York Times. To hear Times Co. digital chief Martin Niesenholtz tell it, that's not out of the question.
As part of the paper's "Talk to the Newsroom" series, a reader asks Niesenholtz whether newspapers have "considered getting together and forming a cooperative newspaper site (for example, newsline) where people would have to pay a monthly subscription fee (similar to cable) to access the articles that member newspapers/blogging sites/magazines published?"
The kind of cooperative you suggest is certainly a possibility, particularly as more and more publishers question the advertising-only model. I can easily imagine such a venture taking shape among many newspapers. The one thing I would question is your assumption that "all newspapers are losing money by offering free content online." We believe this has been a successful model for some newspapers.
(Uh, which ones would those be, again?)
He also fields a question on whether the Times might bring back a paid-content model in some form soon. Niesenholtz:
Today, we continue to carefully analyze the question of how paid content (subscriptions, micro-payments, membership tiers) can augment our core advertising business. The trick, of course, is to garner incremental revenue from the user without significantly cannibalizing the high rate ad pages that now account for a very significant amount of money. Unlike many local news Web sites that still depend mostly on declining classified ad revenues, NYTimes.com has a very large national display revenue stream. As we develop new pay-for-content ideas, we must carefully balance our ability to generate meaningful dollars from both sources.
Translation: We're hoping someone else figures it out real soon and we can just copy their model.
Comments
If you are commenting using a Facebook account, your profile information may be displayed with your comment depending on your privacy settings. By leaving the 'Post to Facebook' box selected, your comment will be published to your Facebook profile in addition to the space below.




