Recent Blog Posts
-
Nicked Off: The Curious Path of Gawker's Chief
Oct 11 20102:39 pm EDT -
Conde Nast Closing 'Portfolio'
Apr 27 200910:02 am EDT -
Newspaper Circ: 'WSJ' Gains as 'NY Post' Tumbles
Apr 27 20099:32 am EDT -
Idle Chatter: The Prognosis for Newspapers, more
Apr 27 20098:55 am EDT -
Late Breaks: MySpace, NYT, 'New York'
Apr 24 20094:01 pm EDT -
Nostalgia, Entitlement and Murdoch's 'Journal'
Apr 24 20094:00 pm EDT -
Huffpo's Lerer on the 'New and Better' Journalism
Apr 24 200912:44 pm EDT -
Ailes Heats Up Cold Spring with Newspaper War
Apr 24 200912:33 pm EDT -
Happy Friday. Now Watch This.
Apr 24 200910:24 am EDT -
Idle Chatter: NPR Cutbacks, Jon Meacham, more
Apr 24 20098:50 am EDT
Links
- SI.com - Richard Deitsch

- I Want Media

- Editor & Publisher

- Galleycat

- Magazine Death Pool

- WWD's Memo Pad

- Talking Biz News

- Media Nation

- Hollywood Wiretap

- FAIR

- The Media Pundit

- NYT Media

- MediaFile

- Gapper Blog - Media

- Jezebel

- The Business Insider

- Viral Video

- Ad Age

- Newsbusters

- News After Newspapers

- Nikki Finke

- News Hounds

- NY Observer media page

- Valleywag

- Paid Content

- TVNewser

- Nieman Journalism Lab

- Romenesko

- Keith Kelly

- Contact Me

- Cover Awards

- Tyndall Report

- Jon Friedman

- Gawker

- Jon Fine

- Media Shift

- HuffPo Media

'Newsday' Leads the Paid Content Charge. Yikes.
Why do I suspect that it won't be Cablevision, of all the newspaper owners out there, that solves the puzzle of getting consumers to pay for news online?
Cablevision COO Tom Rutledge let slip in a conference call yesterday that the company plans to "end the distribution of free Web content" on Newsday's website and thereby "make our newsgathering capabilities a service to our customers."
He didn't elaborate, nor did Newsday publisher Timothy Knight shed much more light when he told his paper, "We are in the process of transforming Newsday's Web site into an enhanced, locally focused cable service that we believe will become an important benefit for Newsday and Cablevision customers." Details TK.
Whether there's some way to unscramble the free-online-news egg and make consumer dollars replace vanishing ad revenues is a question that's obsessed virtually every deep thinker in the journalism world over the past few months.
Without knowing more about Cablevision's plans, it's impossible to say they won't work. But you have to wonder how a company that's already written down more than $400 million of the $650 million it paid for Newsday just last year suddenly came into possession of so much foresight.
Analyst Ken Doctor has already spotted a key weakness in Cablevision's thinking: Even as a free offering, Newsday.com isn't terribly sticky. The average reader only spends 4 minutes 25 seconds a month on it. "Confronted with having to pay for a site you may use less than five minutes a month, you think you are going to pay for it?" Doctor writes. "Wrong site. Wrong year. Wrong metro area." He does allow that the pay model might hold some promise if Newsday were to "shift its model to being more hyper-local about Long Island, rather than bringing the world to Long Island."
Media analyst Kevin Kamen was also quick to pooh-pooh Cablevision's announcement:
If Cablevision honestly believes that charging a web subscriber fee is going to significantly impact their profit margins then they are really in for a shocker. This has not been an effective tool to drive revenue at other newspapers and will not increase the valuation of Newsday. If anything, millions less will visit their website and readers will seek other alternatives to fill their appetite for local news.
Comments
If you are commenting using a Facebook account, your profile information may be displayed with your comment depending on your privacy settings. By leaving the 'Post to Facebook' box selected, your comment will be published to your Facebook profile in addition to the space below.




