Recent Blog Posts
-
Conde Nast Closing 'Portfolio'
Apr 27 200910:02 am EDT -
Newspaper Circ: 'WSJ' Gains as 'NY Post' Tumbles
Apr 27 20099:32 am EDT -
Idle Chatter: The Prognosis for Newspapers, more
Apr 27 20098:55 am EDT -
Late Breaks: MySpace, NYT, 'New York'
Apr 24 20094:01 pm EDT -
Nostalgia, Entitlement and Murdoch's 'Journal'
Apr 24 20094:00 pm EDT -
Huffpo's Lerer on the 'New and Better' Journalism
Apr 24 200912:44 pm EDT -
Ailes Heats Up Cold Spring with Newspaper War
Apr 24 200912:33 pm EDT -
Happy Friday. Now Watch This.
Apr 24 200910:24 am EDT -
Idle Chatter: NPR Cutbacks, Jon Meacham, more
Apr 24 20098:50 am EDT -
Late Breaks: Twitter and the 'Times,' more
Apr 23 20095:59 pm EDT
Links
- SI.com - Richard Deitsch

- I Want Media

- Editor & Publisher

- Galleycat

- Magazine Death Pool

- WWD's Memo Pad

- Talking Biz News

- Media Nation

- Hollywood Wiretap

- FAIR

- The Media Pundit

- NYT Media

- MediaFile

- Gapper Blog - Media

- Jezebel

- The Business Insider

- Viral Video

- Ad Age

- Newsbusters

- News After Newspapers

- Nikki Finke

- News Hounds

- NY Observer media page

- Valleywag

- Paid Content

- TVNewser

- Nieman Journalism Lab

- Romenesko

- Keith Kelly

- Contact Me

- Cover Awards

- Tyndall Report

- Jon Friedman

- Gawker

- Jon Fine

- Media Shift

- HuffPo Media

Hatfill Denied Appeal of 'NY Times' Libel Ruling
Former government scientist Steven Hatfill will get no satisfaction from The New York Times.
The Supreme Court has put an end to Hatfill's crusade to punish the paper for linking his name to the 2001 anthrax attacks, rejecting his appeal of an earlier ruling by the 4th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals. Hatfill says that columnist Nicholas Kristof libeled him by referring to him as the "likely culprit" behind the string of anthrax mailings that ratcheted up fears in the weeks after Sept. 11.
While he turned out not to be the perpetrator -- the government now says that was the late Bruce Ivins -- Kristof's columns didn't qualify as libel in the eyes of the courts because Hatfill was a public figure, and thus subject to a higher legal test that requires a plaintiff to show actual malice on the part of the defendant.






