Recent Blog Posts
-
Nicked Off: The Curious Path of Gawker's Chief
Oct 11 20102:39 pm EDT -
Conde Nast Closing 'Portfolio'
Apr 27 200910:02 am EDT -
Newspaper Circ: 'WSJ' Gains as 'NY Post' Tumbles
Apr 27 20099:32 am EDT -
Idle Chatter: The Prognosis for Newspapers, more
Apr 27 20098:55 am EDT -
Late Breaks: MySpace, NYT, 'New York'
Apr 24 20094:01 pm EDT -
Nostalgia, Entitlement and Murdoch's 'Journal'
Apr 24 20094:00 pm EDT -
Huffpo's Lerer on the 'New and Better' Journalism
Apr 24 200912:44 pm EDT -
Ailes Heats Up Cold Spring with Newspaper War
Apr 24 200912:33 pm EDT -
Happy Friday. Now Watch This.
Apr 24 200910:24 am EDT -
Idle Chatter: NPR Cutbacks, Jon Meacham, more
Apr 24 20098:50 am EDT
Links
- SI.com - Richard Deitsch

- I Want Media

- Editor & Publisher

- Galleycat

- Magazine Death Pool

- WWD's Memo Pad

- Talking Biz News

- Media Nation

- Hollywood Wiretap

- FAIR

- The Media Pundit

- NYT Media

- MediaFile

- Gapper Blog - Media

- Jezebel

- The Business Insider

- Viral Video

- Ad Age

- Newsbusters

- News After Newspapers

- Nikki Finke

- News Hounds

- NY Observer media page

- Valleywag

- Paid Content

- TVNewser

- Nieman Journalism Lab

- Romenesko

- Keith Kelly

- Contact Me

- Cover Awards

- Tyndall Report

- Jon Friedman

- Gawker

- Jon Fine

- Media Shift

- HuffPo Media

Number Crunch: Downsizing at the Business Mags
Yesterday, I looked at what has happened to editorial-staff size at Time and Newsweek over the past 10 years. Today, as promised, it's the business magazines' turn.
To reiterate my caveats: These aren't necessarily apples-to-apples comparisons. Different magazines classify different types of employees in different ways, and I didn't bother to try to figure out who is/was full-time, part-time, freelance, etc. Also, magazines don't print a masthead every month, so the time periods aren't perfectly congruent, and the 2008 figures don't necessarily reflect the most recent cutbacks.
That said:
BusinessWeek editorial masthead circa 1998: 255
BusinessWeek editorial masthead circa 2008: 214
Percent shrinkage: 16.1
Fortune editorial masthead circa 1998: 188
Fortune editorial masthead circa 2008: 171
Percent shrinkage: 9.0
Forbes editorial masthead circa 1998: 208
Forbes editorial masthead circa 2008: 189
Percent shrinkage: 9.1
Comments
If you are commenting using a Facebook account, your profile information may be displayed with your comment depending on your privacy settings. By leaving the 'Post to Facebook' box selected, your comment will be published to your Facebook profile in addition to the space below.





