Recent Blog Posts
-
Conde Nast Closing 'Portfolio'
Apr 27 200910:02 am EDT -
Newspaper Circ: 'WSJ' Gains as 'NY Post' Tumbles
Apr 27 20099:32 am EDT -
Idle Chatter: The Prognosis for Newspapers, more
Apr 27 20098:55 am EDT -
Late Breaks: MySpace, NYT, 'New York'
Apr 24 20094:01 pm EDT -
Nostalgia, Entitlement and Murdoch's 'Journal'
Apr 24 20094:00 pm EDT
Links
- SI.com - Richard Deitsch
- I Want Media
- Editor & Publisher
- Galleycat
- Magazine Death Pool
- WWD's Memo Pad
- Talking Biz News
- Media Nation
- Hollywood Wiretap
- FAIR
- The Media Pundit
- NYT Media
- MediaFile
- Gapper Blog - Media
- Jezebel
- The Business Insider
- Viral Video
- Ad Age
- Newsbusters
- News After Newspapers
- Nikki Finke
- News Hounds
- NY Observer media page
- Valleywag
- Paid Content
- TVNewser
- Nieman Journalism Lab
- Romenesko
- Keith Kelly
- Contact Me
- Cover Awards
- Tyndall Report
- Jon Friedman
- Gawker
- Jon Fine
- Media Shift
- HuffPo Media
Aug 22 2008 2:09pm EDT
Update: Murdoch Not Behind 'WSJ' Veep Mix-Up
It looks like that faulty intelligence on Barack Obama's VP pick published by Dow Jones Newswires and featured, briefly, on WSJ.com didn't come from owner Rupert Murdoch. Here's a statement from a Dow Jones spokeswoman:
"The Journal news department was sent an erroneous announcement about the selection of a vice presidential candidate for Barack Obama. Once we realized the announcement was erroneous, we immediately withdrew the headline. We regret any inconvenience this caused our readers."
Inconvenience? Quite the opposite. On behalf of us bloggers, this was just what we needed on a slow news day.
