Recent Blog Posts
-
Nicked Off: The Curious Path of Gawker's Chief
Oct 11 20102:39 pm EDT -
Conde Nast Closing 'Portfolio'
Apr 27 200910:02 am EDT -
Newspaper Circ: 'WSJ' Gains as 'NY Post' Tumbles
Apr 27 20099:32 am EDT -
Idle Chatter: The Prognosis for Newspapers, more
Apr 27 20098:55 am EDT -
Late Breaks: MySpace, NYT, 'New York'
Apr 24 20094:01 pm EDT -
Nostalgia, Entitlement and Murdoch's 'Journal'
Apr 24 20094:00 pm EDT -
Huffpo's Lerer on the 'New and Better' Journalism
Apr 24 200912:44 pm EDT -
Ailes Heats Up Cold Spring with Newspaper War
Apr 24 200912:33 pm EDT -
Happy Friday. Now Watch This.
Apr 24 200910:24 am EDT -
Idle Chatter: NPR Cutbacks, Jon Meacham, more
Apr 24 20098:50 am EDT
Links
- SI.com - Richard Deitsch

- I Want Media

- Editor & Publisher

- Galleycat

- Magazine Death Pool

- WWD's Memo Pad

- Talking Biz News

- Media Nation

- Hollywood Wiretap

- FAIR

- The Media Pundit

- NYT Media

- MediaFile

- Gapper Blog - Media

- Jezebel

- The Business Insider

- Viral Video

- Ad Age

- Newsbusters

- News After Newspapers

- Nikki Finke

- News Hounds

- NY Observer media page

- Valleywag

- Paid Content

- TVNewser

- Nieman Journalism Lab

- Romenesko

- Keith Kelly

- Contact Me

- Cover Awards

- Tyndall Report

- Jon Friedman

- Gawker

- Jon Fine

- Media Shift

- HuffPo Media

Don Imus: Racist, or Just Clueless?
When will Don Imus learn that he's not down with black people?
The serially offending radio host has a not-entirely-implausible explanation for comments he made yesterday, about NFL star Adam "Pacman" Jones, that sparked fresh charges of racism. On his radio show this morning, Imus claimed that, when he asked, during a discussion of Jones' lengthy arrest record, "what color" the cornerback is, it was only to make the point that police discriminate against African-Americans.
"What people should be outraged about is that they arrest blacks for no reason," he said. "I mean, there's no reason to arrest this kid six times. Maybe he did something once, but everyone does something once."
Is this explanation legit? Given the incredibly ambiguous nature of Imus' remarks -- after being told that Jones is black, he merely responded, "There you go. Now we know" -- there's little choice but to take him at his word.
But, as I've said before, the problem isn't so much Imus' intent as his fogeyish failure to grasp the realities of the media universe which he inhabits. When you're a 67-year-old white millionaire with a history of racial controversy, ambiguity doesn't cut it. Merely asking the question "What color is he?" seems to betray a pre-Civil Rights Act mindset, and unless you make your meaning clear, that's going to be the takeaway -- if not for the average listener, then at least for the folks at Media Matters who are hunting for your scalp.
Imus thinks, because he likes old R&B and quotes Martin Luther King Jr., that his goodwill toward black people is evident to all. He even seems to think he's an honorary member of the race, to the point that he can get away with saying the sorts of things about black people that black people can (sometimes) get away with saying about each other -- things like calling women "nappy-headed hos."
In short, Imus simply doesn't understand how most of the world views him, which is no small failing for a professional ironist.
Comments
If you are commenting using a Facebook account, your profile information may be displayed with your comment depending on your privacy settings. By leaving the 'Post to Facebook' box selected, your comment will be published to your Facebook profile in addition to the space below.





