Recent Blog Posts
-
Conde Nast Closing 'Portfolio'
Apr 27 200910:02 am EDT -
Newspaper Circ: 'WSJ' Gains as 'NY Post' Tumbles
Apr 27 20099:32 am EDT -
Idle Chatter: The Prognosis for Newspapers, more
Apr 27 20098:55 am EDT -
Late Breaks: MySpace, NYT, 'New York'
Apr 24 20094:01 pm EDT -
Nostalgia, Entitlement and Murdoch's 'Journal'
Apr 24 20094:00 pm EDT
Links
- SI.com - Richard Deitsch

- I Want Media

- Editor & Publisher

- Galleycat

- Magazine Death Pool

- WWD's Memo Pad

- Talking Biz News

- Media Nation

- Hollywood Wiretap

- FAIR

- The Media Pundit

- NYT Media

- MediaFile

- Gapper Blog - Media

- Jezebel

- The Business Insider

- Viral Video

- Ad Age

- Newsbusters

- News After Newspapers

- Nikki Finke

- News Hounds

- NY Observer media page

- Valleywag

- Paid Content

- TVNewser

- Nieman Journalism Lab

- Romenesko

- Keith Kelly

- Contact Me

- Cover Awards

- Tyndall Report

- Jon Friedman

- Gawker

- Jon Fine

- Media Shift

- HuffPo Media

Poll: Has Murdoch Improved the 'Journal'?
Lately, I've noticed a lot of people saying, whether in private conversations or in published columns, that they think The Wall Street Journal has only gotten better since Rupert Murdoch started remaking it to his tastes. This in contrast, of course, to the widely-voiced fear that Murdoch the Arch-Vulgarian would turn it into a business-news version of one of his tabloids, Page 3 girl and all.
I could tell you my opinion, but I'd rather hear yours. Do you think the Journal is really better now than it was pre-News Corp., or is it just fashionably contrarian to say so? Go here to vote in our poll, and, if you'd like to elaborate, email me. I'll print the best responses (anonymously, at your request) when I run the poll results. □





