Recent Blog Posts
-
Conde Nast Closing 'Portfolio'
Apr 27 200910:02 am EDT -
Newspaper Circ: 'WSJ' Gains as 'NY Post' Tumbles
Apr 27 20099:32 am EDT -
Idle Chatter: The Prognosis for Newspapers, more
Apr 27 20098:55 am EDT -
Late Breaks: MySpace, NYT, 'New York'
Apr 24 20094:01 pm EDT -
Nostalgia, Entitlement and Murdoch's 'Journal'
Apr 24 20094:00 pm EDT
Links
- SI.com - Richard Deitsch

- I Want Media

- Editor & Publisher

- Galleycat

- Magazine Death Pool

- WWD's Memo Pad

- Talking Biz News

- Media Nation

- Hollywood Wiretap

- FAIR

- The Media Pundit

- NYT Media

- MediaFile

- Gapper Blog - Media

- Jezebel

- The Business Insider

- Viral Video

- Ad Age

- Newsbusters

- News After Newspapers

- Nikki Finke

- News Hounds

- NY Observer media page

- Valleywag

- Paid Content

- TVNewser

- Nieman Journalism Lab

- Romenesko

- Keith Kelly

- Contact Me

- Cover Awards

- Tyndall Report

- Jon Friedman

- Gawker

- Jon Fine

- Media Shift

- HuffPo Media

It's Alive! 'WSJ' Independence Panel Speaks Out
Finally, an answer: Yes, the special committee created to safeguard The Wall Street Journal's editorial independence from News Corp. is peeved about how it all went down.
Tom Bray, the committee's chairman, just issued a statement, via the Journal's website, saying its members should have been notified before Marcus Brauchli was asked to resign as managing editor, not afterwards.
"[L]earning of the Brauchli matter after the fact failed to meet the letter and the spirit of the agreement," Bray writes. However, he adds, "The Committee met subsequently and decided that there was no practical way to 'unresign' Brauchli and start the process over." So a statement of disapproval is pretty much where all this ends.
The statement doesn't directly touch on the concept of constructive termination, which, as I've argued, is what News Corp.'s handling of Brauchli amounts to.






