Recent Blog Posts
-
Nicked Off: The Curious Path of Gawker's Chief
Oct 11 20102:39 pm EDT -
Conde Nast Closing 'Portfolio'
Apr 27 200910:02 am EDT -
Newspaper Circ: 'WSJ' Gains as 'NY Post' Tumbles
Apr 27 20099:32 am EDT -
Idle Chatter: The Prognosis for Newspapers, more
Apr 27 20098:55 am EDT -
Late Breaks: MySpace, NYT, 'New York'
Apr 24 20094:01 pm EDT -
Nostalgia, Entitlement and Murdoch's 'Journal'
Apr 24 20094:00 pm EDT -
Huffpo's Lerer on the 'New and Better' Journalism
Apr 24 200912:44 pm EDT -
Ailes Heats Up Cold Spring with Newspaper War
Apr 24 200912:33 pm EDT -
Happy Friday. Now Watch This.
Apr 24 200910:24 am EDT -
Idle Chatter: NPR Cutbacks, Jon Meacham, more
Apr 24 20098:50 am EDT
Links
- SI.com - Richard Deitsch

- I Want Media

- Editor & Publisher

- Galleycat

- Magazine Death Pool

- WWD's Memo Pad

- Talking Biz News

- Media Nation

- Hollywood Wiretap

- FAIR

- The Media Pundit

- NYT Media

- MediaFile

- Gapper Blog - Media

- Jezebel

- The Business Insider

- Viral Video

- Ad Age

- Newsbusters

- News After Newspapers

- Nikki Finke

- News Hounds

- NY Observer media page

- Valleywag

- Paid Content

- TVNewser

- Nieman Journalism Lab

- Romenesko

- Keith Kelly

- Contact Me

- Cover Awards

- Tyndall Report

- Jon Friedman

- Gawker

- Jon Fine

- Media Shift

- HuffPo Media

Not All WMD Intelligence Is Hype
Was the dean of national security reporters misled by his sources into downplaying a genuine threat?
Back in February, The New Yorker's Seymour Hersh looked into the fuzzily-explained bombing by Israeli forces of a target in Syria.
Hersh noted leaked reports that the targeted building was a nuclear reactor under construction with North Korean help; but he also quoted a range of sources (including several in the Syrian regime) who insisted otherwise, claiming it was actually a fertilizer warehouse, or a factory for missiles or chemical weapons. After a good deal of back and forth, Hersh seemed to side with the nuke-skeptics, writing, "Whatever was under construction, with North Korean help, it apparently had little to do with agriculture -- or with nuclear reactors -- but much to do with Syria's defense posture, and its military relationship with North Korea."
Fast-forward to yesterday, when the Bush Administration, in what Time called a "convincing presentation," went public with evidence that the site was indeed a reactor in the making.
Is this another instance of the trend, identified by Slate's Jack Shafer, of Hersh being "consistently off the mark" in his post-9/11 reporting? (Of course, Shafer wrote that while predicting that Hersh would be proven wrong about the absence of WMDs in Iraq. Whoops.)
No, says a New Yorker spokeswoman, because Hersh's story -- despite the passage quoted above -- wasn't meant to be read as debunking the claims of a reactor. "It wasn't a 'gotcha' piece," she says. "He was raising questions, saying 'Here's this mystery, there are contradictions in the various published accounts, what's the real story here?' He didn't come to any big conclusion."
Comments
If you are commenting using a Facebook account, your profile information may be displayed with your comment depending on your privacy settings. By leaving the 'Post to Facebook' box selected, your comment will be published to your Facebook profile in addition to the space below.




