Sign In
SHARE
Glad, Well, and Good
On Friday I ran an item about New Yorker writer Malcolm Gladwell, who, according to a source, had ignored a warning from a
fact-checker, resulting in an embarrassing correction for the magazine.
Ironically enough, that item could have used more rigorous verification. Although I had attempted to contact Gladwell to confirm the account, I didn't hear back from him until last night, when he got in touch to dispute my source's version of events.
Although Gladwell takes full responsibility for the mistake -- an inaccurate characterization of a passage from the book The Bell Curve -- he insists he was not alerted to his error before the piece's publication.
"It never came up. I wish it had," he says. "If I'd known it was an error, I'd have corrected it beforehand in a heartbeat. If you know anything about The New Yorker's fact-checking process, you'd know it's impossible" for the events described in my item to have taken place, he adds.
David Remnick, The New Yorker's editor in chief, says the breakdown occurred as the piece was being closed. A question arose about the passage from The Bell Curve, but Gladwell had not submitted the text to the fact-checking department as part of his research materials. "We didn't have time" to find a copy of the book, says Remnick, "and Malcolm thought he was sure of what it said, and we went with it, and we were wrong, and we corrected it."
Gladwell said there "was no kind of showdown. At no time did anyone confront me with the truth. I relied on my memory, and my memory was wrong."
As for my claim that Gladwell is the "bane" of New Yorker fact-checkers, while insiders say his inaccessibility has been a recurring source of headaches, Remnick insists it's a non-issue. "Malcolm doesn't have a quote-unquote problem with the checking department."
Loading...
Thank you for registering as a Portfolio.com Insider. Your comment has been added.
Create Your Public Profile
- Conde Nast Closing 'Portfolio'
- Apr 27 2009 10:02AM EDT
- Newspaper Circ: 'WSJ' Gains as 'NY Post' Tumbles
- Apr 27 2009 9:32AM EDT
- Idle Chatter: The Prognosis for Newspapers, more
- Apr 27 2009 8:55AM EDT
- Late Breaks: MySpace, NYT, 'New York'
- Apr 24 2009 4:01PM EDT
- Nostalgia, Entitlement and Murdoch's 'Journal'
- Apr 24 2009 4:00PM EDT
- Huffpo's Lerer on the 'New and Better' Journalism
- Apr 24 2009 12:44PM EDT
- Ailes Heats Up Cold Spring with Newspaper War
- Apr 24 2009 12:33PM EDT
- Happy Friday. Now Watch This.
- Apr 24 2009 10:24AM EDT
- Idle Chatter: NPR Cutbacks, Jon Meacham, more
- Apr 24 2009 8:50AM EDT
- Late Breaks: Twitter and the 'Times,' more
- Apr 23 2009 5:59PM EDT
- CNN Partner's Polling Finds CNN Fair, Balanced
- Apr 23 2009 4:10PM EDT
- 'Scientific American' Editor Out in Reorg
- Apr 23 2009 3:19PM EDT
- Idle Chatter: MySpace, Nerve, 'Millionaire,' more
- Apr 23 2009 8:20AM EDT
- Late Breaks: 'Observer' Editor Resigns, more
- Apr 22 2009 4:15PM EDT
- One Marriage, One Memoir, Two Opinions
- Apr 22 2009 2:31PM EDT
Archive
Categories
Links
- Contact Me
- News After Newspapers
- Romenesko
- Gawker
- Ad Age
- WWD's Memo Pad
- Keith Kelly
- NYT Media
- Jon Fine
- TVNewser
- Magazine Death Pool
- HuffPo Media
- Galleycat
- News Hounds
- Newsbusters
- Jezebel
- Editor & Publisher
- Hollywood Wiretap
- The Media Pundit
- FAIR
- I Want Media
- Viral Video
- Nikki Finke
- MediaFile
- The Business Insider
- Paid Content
- Valleywag
- Cover Awards
- Talking Biz News
- SI.com - Richard Deitsch
- Gapper Blog - Media
- Jon Friedman
- Nieman Journalism Lab
- NY Observer media page
- Media Shift
- Tyndall Report
- Media Nation
