Recent Blog Posts
-
Conde Nast Closing 'Portfolio'
Apr 27 200910:02 am EDT -
Newspaper Circ: 'WSJ' Gains as 'NY Post' Tumbles
Apr 27 20099:32 am EDT -
Idle Chatter: The Prognosis for Newspapers, more
Apr 27 20098:55 am EDT -
Late Breaks: MySpace, NYT, 'New York'
Apr 24 20094:01 pm EDT -
Nostalgia, Entitlement and Murdoch's 'Journal'
Apr 24 20094:00 pm EDT
Links
- SI.com - Richard Deitsch

- I Want Media

- Editor & Publisher

- Galleycat

- Magazine Death Pool

- WWD's Memo Pad

- Talking Biz News

- Media Nation

- Hollywood Wiretap

- FAIR

- The Media Pundit

- NYT Media

- MediaFile

- Gapper Blog - Media

- Jezebel

- The Business Insider

- Viral Video

- Ad Age

- Newsbusters

- News After Newspapers

- Nikki Finke

- News Hounds

- NY Observer media page

- Valleywag

- Paid Content

- TVNewser

- Nieman Journalism Lab

- Romenesko

- Keith Kelly

- Contact Me

- Cover Awards

- Tyndall Report

- Jon Friedman

- Gawker

- Jon Fine

- Media Shift

- HuffPo Media

Who Is 'Rolling Stone' Actually Endorsing?
Let's say you own and edit a major magazine. Let's also say you support a certain candidate for president of the United States of America -- the same candidate the vast majority of your readers, going by demographics, were probably already supporting.
Let's say this candidate has been somewhat bedeviled, in recent weeks, by claims that the press harbors a huge crush on him. Let's say many observers, including the candidate himself, attribute his recent losses in two very important nominating contests to the successful promulgation of this trope.
In this scenario, would you, the magazine owner, be helping or hurting your candidate of choice by portraying him on your cover, wreathed in a halo of heavenly light, next to the quasi-messianic cover line "A New Hope"?
I'd say hurting.






