Recent Blog Posts
-
Conde Nast Closing 'Portfolio'
Apr 27 200910:02 am EDT -
Newspaper Circ: 'WSJ' Gains as 'NY Post' Tumbles
Apr 27 20099:32 am EDT -
Idle Chatter: The Prognosis for Newspapers, more
Apr 27 20098:55 am EDT -
Late Breaks: MySpace, NYT, 'New York'
Apr 24 20094:01 pm EDT -
Nostalgia, Entitlement and Murdoch's 'Journal'
Apr 24 20094:00 pm EDT
Links
- SI.com - Richard Deitsch

- I Want Media

- Editor & Publisher

- Galleycat

- Magazine Death Pool

- WWD's Memo Pad

- Talking Biz News

- Media Nation

- Hollywood Wiretap

- FAIR

- The Media Pundit

- NYT Media

- MediaFile

- Gapper Blog - Media

- Jezebel

- The Business Insider

- Viral Video

- Ad Age

- Newsbusters

- News After Newspapers

- Nikki Finke

- News Hounds

- NY Observer media page

- Valleywag

- Paid Content

- TVNewser

- Nieman Journalism Lab

- Romenesko

- Keith Kelly

- Contact Me

- Cover Awards

- Tyndall Report

- Jon Friedman

- Gawker

- Jon Fine

- Media Shift

- HuffPo Media

Lingering Questions About the Oscars
1)Was the lack of blockbusters among the "best picture" nominees responsible for the miserably low ratings? My colleague Zubin Jelveh crunches the numbers on that popular theory and concludes it can't be the sole explanation.
2)Where were all the fancy new commercials? After all, haven't we been hearing ad nauseam about how the Oscars are "the Super Bowl for women"? Stuart Elliot blames the strike for the weak crop of ads; unsure whether the show would go on, agencies declined to commission pricey new spots.
Though not brand new, this newish MasterCard commercial was the biggest hit at my Oscar party:
3)What was up with that slippery spot near the podium that kept threatening to send a presenter toppling into the orchestra pit? Two words: silicone spray.
Related: Fred Schruers's Oscar-night write-up






