Sign In
SHARE
How the 'Times' Blew It on McCain Ethics Story
Did The New York Times wait too long to publish its front-page story on John McCain's ethics, or did it not wait long enough?
Yes. Exactly.
The 3,000-plus-word, quadruple-bylined piece is a great big tuna casserole with a lot of macaroni but very little tuna. Its central assertion -- that John McCain had a relationship with a female lobbyist close enough to alarm his aides and cause them to take precautionary measures -- is newsworthy on its own merits and not even in dispute*. As McCain himself once wrote, "[Q]uestions of honor are raised as much by appearances as by reality in politics." It would've been just as newsworthy back in December, when the reporters working on the story originally filed it.
But somewhere along the way, someone decided it wasn't enough. It was decreed that, having failed to substantiate the obvious implication of that relationship -- that it was not only inappropriate but adulterous -- it could only serve as a datapoint in a bigger feature on McCain's ethical blind spots.
That was a bad call. The result is an article that Josh Marshall aptly describes as feeling overly-lawyered, heavily hedged and jumbled, and Matt Cooper calls "journalistic doublespeak." Worse, by turning a small story into a big one, the Times has opened itself up to all the usual accusations of political bias and left-wing water-carrying.
The irony here is that surely Bill Keller et al thought they were doing the responsible thing by putting the relationship in a broader context. But their good intentions are bound to go unappreciated thanks to a piece that stinks of timid insinuation.
*Update, 3:48 p.m.: Okay, so maybe it is in some dispute; McCain now says his staff never confronted him about the relationship.
Loading...
Thank you for registering as a Portfolio.com Insider. Your comment has been added.
Create Your Public Profile
- Conde Nast Closing 'Portfolio'
- Apr 27 2009 10:02AM EDT
- Newspaper Circ: 'WSJ' Gains as 'NY Post' Tumbles
- Apr 27 2009 9:32AM EDT
- Idle Chatter: The Prognosis for Newspapers, more
- Apr 27 2009 8:55AM EDT
- Late Breaks: MySpace, NYT, 'New York'
- Apr 24 2009 4:01PM EDT
- Nostalgia, Entitlement and Murdoch's 'Journal'
- Apr 24 2009 4:00PM EDT
- Huffpo's Lerer on the 'New and Better' Journalism
- Apr 24 2009 12:44PM EDT
- Ailes Heats Up Cold Spring with Newspaper War
- Apr 24 2009 12:33PM EDT
- Happy Friday. Now Watch This.
- Apr 24 2009 10:24AM EDT
- Idle Chatter: NPR Cutbacks, Jon Meacham, more
- Apr 24 2009 8:50AM EDT
- Late Breaks: Twitter and the 'Times,' more
- Apr 23 2009 5:59PM EDT
- CNN Partner's Polling Finds CNN Fair, Balanced
- Apr 23 2009 4:10PM EDT
- 'Scientific American' Editor Out in Reorg
- Apr 23 2009 3:19PM EDT
- Idle Chatter: MySpace, Nerve, 'Millionaire,' more
- Apr 23 2009 8:20AM EDT
- Late Breaks: 'Observer' Editor Resigns, more
- Apr 22 2009 4:15PM EDT
- One Marriage, One Memoir, Two Opinions
- Apr 22 2009 2:31PM EDT
Archive
Categories
Links
- Contact Me
- News After Newspapers
- Romenesko
- Gawker
- Ad Age
- WWD's Memo Pad
- Keith Kelly
- NYT Media
- Jon Fine
- TVNewser
- Magazine Death Pool
- HuffPo Media
- Galleycat
- News Hounds
- Newsbusters
- Jezebel
- Editor & Publisher
- Hollywood Wiretap
- The Media Pundit
- FAIR
- I Want Media
- Viral Video
- Nikki Finke
- MediaFile
- The Business Insider
- Paid Content
- Valleywag
- Cover Awards
- Talking Biz News
- SI.com - Richard Deitsch
- Gapper Blog - Media
- Jon Friedman
- Nieman Journalism Lab
- NY Observer media page
- Media Shift
- Tyndall Report
- Media Nation
