Recent Blog Posts
-
Nicked Off: The Curious Path of Gawker's Chief
Oct 11 20102:39 pm EDT -
Conde Nast Closing 'Portfolio'
Apr 27 200910:02 am EDT -
Newspaper Circ: 'WSJ' Gains as 'NY Post' Tumbles
Apr 27 20099:32 am EDT -
Idle Chatter: The Prognosis for Newspapers, more
Apr 27 20098:55 am EDT -
Late Breaks: MySpace, NYT, 'New York'
Apr 24 20094:01 pm EDT -
Nostalgia, Entitlement and Murdoch's 'Journal'
Apr 24 20094:00 pm EDT -
Huffpo's Lerer on the 'New and Better' Journalism
Apr 24 200912:44 pm EDT -
Ailes Heats Up Cold Spring with Newspaper War
Apr 24 200912:33 pm EDT -
Happy Friday. Now Watch This.
Apr 24 200910:24 am EDT -
Idle Chatter: NPR Cutbacks, Jon Meacham, more
Apr 24 20098:50 am EDT
Links
- SI.com - Richard Deitsch

- I Want Media

- Editor & Publisher

- Galleycat

- Magazine Death Pool

- WWD's Memo Pad

- Talking Biz News

- Media Nation

- Hollywood Wiretap

- FAIR

- The Media Pundit

- NYT Media

- MediaFile

- Gapper Blog - Media

- Jezebel

- The Business Insider

- Viral Video

- Ad Age

- Newsbusters

- News After Newspapers

- Nikki Finke

- News Hounds

- NY Observer media page

- Valleywag

- Paid Content

- TVNewser

- Nieman Journalism Lab

- Romenesko

- Keith Kelly

- Contact Me

- Cover Awards

- Tyndall Report

- Jon Friedman

- Gawker

- Jon Fine

- Media Shift

- HuffPo Media

Paper Owner Stands Behind 'Racist' Writer, Sorta
The Long Island columnist who penned a race-baiting spoof of Barack Obama isn't off the hook yet.
Over the weekend, Hamptons residents convened at a town hall-style meeting to call for firing of Rick Murphy, editor in chief of the Independent and author of the Obama column, and a similar one about Hillary Clinton that angered gays and lesbians.
Jerry Della Femina, who owns the Independent, told me a few days ago that Murphy will be allowed to keep his job. "Obviously, he's on a short leash right now. I don't believe in firing people if they make a mistake. But if he does it again, of course he's fired."
Della Femina insists that he deplored the columns in question as much as anyone.
"I hated both columns," he says. "I thought they were terrible, disgusting. It was like the guy at the dinner party who tells a horrible, off-color joke and everybody says, 'Oh my God.'"
But he had no chance to veto them, he says, because he didn't see either column until it was in print. "People are saying why didn't I see it, as though that's actually what I do for a living. But [Murphy's] an editor, and he operates without anybody seeing his column. I don't think you would blame [New York Times owner] Pinch Sulzberger because he had someone who was basically making up false stories for the Times."
In fact, Della Femina says that, prior to the flap over the Clinton column, he wasn't in the habit of reading Murphy's work even after it was published. "I don't think I'd read it in a year because it was not something I particularly enjoyed. I thought it was crude. There was an edge to the humor that isn't my kind of stuff."
As for Murphy, he recently published a poorly copyedited apology, in which he wrote, in part:
POURING [sic] OVER ALL THE REASONS WHY I THOUGHT THE ATTEMPTS AT PARODIES I WROTE WERE APPROPRIATE FOR PUBLICATION IS A MEANINGLESS EXERCISE. THEY WEREN'T APPROPRIATE. THEY WEREN'T FOR THE SIMPLE REASON THEY HURT PEOPLE, AND IF A HUMOR COLUMN IS HURTING A READER THAN [sic] THE ENTIRE CONCEPT OF ELICITING LAUGHTER HAS GONE HORRIBLY AWRY.
Comments
If you are commenting using a Facebook account, your profile information may be displayed with your comment depending on your privacy settings. By leaving the 'Post to Facebook' box selected, your comment will be published to your Facebook profile in addition to the space below.




