The Science Behind 'Obama/Osama' Slips
Newscasters, headline writers and others have had quite a bit of difficulty this year distinguishing between Democratic presidential hopeful Barack Obama and terrorist mastermind Osama bin Laden -- or at least between their names. CNN's Alina Cho and Glenn Beck have both said "Osama" when they meant "Obama," while the reverse occurred in a speech by Mitt Romney and an on-screen graphic on CNN's Situation Room.
Can anything be read into such miscues? To find out, I consulted with Michael Erard, author of Um: Slips, Stumbles and Verbal Blunders, and What They Mean.
Saying "Obama" in place of "Osama," or vice versa, is what's termed a malapropism, says Erard. Malapropisms break down into two categories: phonological, or mistakes based on similar sounds, and semantic, or mistakes based on related meanings.
"Obama/Osama" is what Erard calls "a classic phonological malapropism." "Ninety-six percent of the time," he explains, "the word you intend to say and the word that actually comes out of your mouth start with the same sound, have the same number of syllables and have the same stress pattern."
In certain instances, however, semantic confusion could add to the likelihood of an unintended substitution. "Let's say I have some category in my mind of 'enemies of mine,' words that I'm going to have at the ready when I need to, in my rhetoric, drag out the boogieman." Thus, someone who saw both Osama and Obama as antagonists -- as conservatives like Romney and Beck might -- would be at heightened risk of an "Osama/Obama" malapropism (as might the editors at the right-wing New York Post, which made a similar mistake in a headline).
But semantic factors could come into play even in the minds of those who don't view Obama as a threat, notes Erard. "When we have these moments of unplanned creativity, it often involves foreign words," he says, pointing out that John Kerry mixed up "wasabi," the Japanese horseradish, with Wahhabi, the Islamic fundamentalists, in 2004. "Obama" and "Osama" are similar in that regard: "They both sort of belong to that category of "word that I have to be careful when I say them because they're not English."
- Late Breaks: 'WSJ' vs. 'NYT,' Layoff Roundup, more
- Nov 21 2008 4:48PM EST
- Duly Quoted: Was 'WSJ' a Big Fat Waste of Dough?
- Nov 21 2008 4:10PM EST
- How Dividend Cut Puts NYT's Future in Play
- Nov 21 2008 10:52AM EST
- Idle Chatter: Ted's Sales; Angelina's Leverage
- Nov 21 2008 8:37AM EST
- Late Breaks: Slimming Down AP, and Fat Kids
- Nov 20 2008 5:39PM EST
- New York Times Co. Slashes Dividend
- Nov 20 2008 4:17PM EST
- Oprah Headmistress to Drop Suit Against Huffpo
- Nov 20 2008 2:43PM EST
- News Corp. Re-ups Ailes as Fox News Chief
- Nov 20 2008 1:29PM EST
- Garfield: There's No Future Model for Online News
- Nov 20 2008 11:23AM EST
- Idle Chatter: Bad Day to Own Media Stock
- Nov 20 2008 8:35AM EST
- Late Breaks: Steve Jobs Blogger Gagged, more
- Nov 19 2008 5:36PM EST
- AMI Chief Asks Employees to Back Auto Bailout
- Nov 19 2008 2:49PM EST
- 'PC Magazine' Crossing the Digital-Only Frontier
- Nov 19 2008 12:25PM EST
- Number Crunch: Downsizing at the Business Mags
- Nov 19 2008 11:10AM EST
- Idle Chatter: 'Cottage' Carnage at Time Inc., more
- Nov 19 2008 8:20AM EST
Categories
Links
- Contact Me
- News After Newspapers
- Romenesko

- Gawker

- Ad Age

- WWD's Memo Pad

- Keith Kelly

- NYT Media

- Jon Fine

- TVNewser

- Magazine Death Pool

- HuffPo Media

- Radar

- Galleycat

- Book Standard

- News Hounds

- Newsbusters

- Jezebel

- CBS Public Eye

- Editor & Publisher

- Hollywood Wiretap

- The Media Pundit

- FAIR

- I Want Media

- Viral Video

- Nikki Finke

- MediaFile

- Silicon Alley Insider

- Paid Content

- Valleywag

- Channel '08 -- Campaign Ads

- Cover Awards

- Talking Biz News

- SI.com - Richard Deitsch

- Gapper Blog - Media

- Jon Friedman










