Recent Blog Posts
-
Conde Nast Closing 'Portfolio'
Apr 27 200910:02 am EDT -
Newspaper Circ: 'WSJ' Gains as 'NY Post' Tumbles
Apr 27 20099:32 am EDT -
Idle Chatter: The Prognosis for Newspapers, more
Apr 27 20098:55 am EDT -
Late Breaks: MySpace, NYT, 'New York'
Apr 24 20094:01 pm EDT -
Nostalgia, Entitlement and Murdoch's 'Journal'
Apr 24 20094:00 pm EDT
Links
- SI.com - Richard Deitsch
- I Want Media
- Editor & Publisher
- Galleycat
- Magazine Death Pool
- WWD's Memo Pad
- Talking Biz News
- Media Nation
- Hollywood Wiretap
- FAIR
- The Media Pundit
- NYT Media
- MediaFile
- Gapper Blog - Media
- Jezebel
- The Business Insider
- Viral Video
- Ad Age
- Newsbusters
- News After Newspapers
- Nikki Finke
- News Hounds
- NY Observer media page
- Valleywag
- Paid Content
- TVNewser
- Nieman Journalism Lab
- Romenesko
- Keith Kelly
- Contact Me
- Cover Awards
- Tyndall Report
- Jon Friedman
- Gawker
- Jon Fine
- Media Shift
- HuffPo Media
Dec 12 2007 12:00am EDT
Regretting the Error, Spectacularly
All corrections are not created equal. The British ones are the best. The combination of a hyper-aggressive tabloid press and punitive libel laws means that when British newspapers backpedal on a story, they backpedal hard.
For proof, see Regret The Error's annual round-up of the year's best corrections. Here's my personal favorite, from the Sunday Times of London:
An article about Lord Lambton ("Lord Louche, sex king of Chiantishire", News Review, January 7) falsely stated that his son Ned (now Lord Durham) and daughter Catherine held a party at Lord Lambton's villa, Cetinale, in 1997, which degenerated into such an orgy that Lord Lambton banned them from Cetinale for years. In fact, Lord Durham does not have a sister called Catherine (that is the name of his former wife), there has not been any orgiastic party of any kind and Lord Lambton did not ban him (or Catherine) from Cetinale at all. We apologise sincerely to Lord Durham for the hurt and embarrassment caused.
