Recent Blog Posts
-
Nicked Off: The Curious Path of Gawker's Chief
Oct 11 20102:39 pm EDT -
Conde Nast Closing 'Portfolio'
Apr 27 200910:02 am EDT -
Newspaper Circ: 'WSJ' Gains as 'NY Post' Tumbles
Apr 27 20099:32 am EDT -
Idle Chatter: The Prognosis for Newspapers, more
Apr 27 20098:55 am EDT -
Late Breaks: MySpace, NYT, 'New York'
Apr 24 20094:01 pm EDT -
Nostalgia, Entitlement and Murdoch's 'Journal'
Apr 24 20094:00 pm EDT -
Huffpo's Lerer on the 'New and Better' Journalism
Apr 24 200912:44 pm EDT -
Ailes Heats Up Cold Spring with Newspaper War
Apr 24 200912:33 pm EDT -
Happy Friday. Now Watch This.
Apr 24 200910:24 am EDT -
Idle Chatter: NPR Cutbacks, Jon Meacham, more
Apr 24 20098:50 am EDT
Links
- SI.com - Richard Deitsch

- I Want Media

- Editor & Publisher

- Galleycat

- Magazine Death Pool

- WWD's Memo Pad

- Talking Biz News

- Media Nation

- Hollywood Wiretap

- FAIR

- The Media Pundit

- NYT Media

- MediaFile

- Gapper Blog - Media

- Jezebel

- The Business Insider

- Viral Video

- Ad Age

- Newsbusters

- News After Newspapers

- Nikki Finke

- News Hounds

- NY Observer media page

- Valleywag

- Paid Content

- TVNewser

- Nieman Journalism Lab

- Romenesko

- Keith Kelly

- Contact Me

- Cover Awards

- Tyndall Report

- Jon Friedman

- Gawker

- Jon Fine

- Media Shift

- HuffPo Media

Jon Stewart Paying Staff -- For Real This Time
A month ago, when the writers strike first got under way, I reported that Jon Stewart would be paying his staffers' salaries for at least part of the work stoppage out of his own pocket. But Stewart's spokesman quickly denied that was the case, leaving me to backpedal.
Today, however, Bill Carter of The New York Times reports that Stewart is part of a group of late-night hosts who "have all committed to pay their staffs out of their own funds."
Did something change? I called Stewart's spokesman and his agent, but both declined to comment.
But from what I was able to gather elsewhere, the arrangement is relatively new. Early on in the strike, Stewart was able to persuade Comedy Central to keep paying Daily Show employees (per this Los Angeles Times story from yesterday), but as it has worn on he has had to chip in money of his own to ensure no one got laid off.
Bottom line, my initial report was still inaccurate, but maybe not totally unfounded. Did my source mix up what might happen with what was happening? It's possible. Did I err in rushing secondhand, unconfirmed information to print? Without question. But at least my hunch that Stewart was the sort of mensch who'd reach into his own pocket to help his workers turned out to be on target.
Comments
If you are commenting using a Facebook account, your profile information may be displayed with your comment depending on your privacy settings. By leaving the 'Post to Facebook' box selected, your comment will be published to your Facebook profile in addition to the space below.





