Recent Blog Posts
-
Conde Nast Closing 'Portfolio'
Apr 27 200910:02 am EDT -
Newspaper Circ: 'WSJ' Gains as 'NY Post' Tumbles
Apr 27 20099:32 am EDT -
Idle Chatter: The Prognosis for Newspapers, more
Apr 27 20098:55 am EDT -
Late Breaks: MySpace, NYT, 'New York'
Apr 24 20094:01 pm EDT -
Nostalgia, Entitlement and Murdoch's 'Journal'
Apr 24 20094:00 pm EDT
Links
- SI.com - Richard Deitsch

- I Want Media

- Editor & Publisher

- Galleycat

- Magazine Death Pool

- WWD's Memo Pad

- Talking Biz News

- Media Nation

- Hollywood Wiretap

- FAIR

- The Media Pundit

- NYT Media

- MediaFile

- Gapper Blog - Media

- Jezebel

- The Business Insider

- Viral Video

- Ad Age

- Newsbusters

- News After Newspapers

- Nikki Finke

- News Hounds

- NY Observer media page

- Valleywag

- Paid Content

- TVNewser

- Nieman Journalism Lab

- Romenesko

- Keith Kelly

- Contact Me

- Cover Awards

- Tyndall Report

- Jon Friedman

- Gawker

- Jon Fine

- Media Shift

- HuffPo Media

The Hurt Begins for 'In Touch,' 'Life & Style'
Looks like I spoke too soon when I said In Touch and Life & Style weren't feeling any pain from their cover-price increases. Mediaweek reports that sales of both tabloids have fallen off since they went from $1.99 to $2.99 two issues ago. Life & Style is down around 10 percent, while In Touch has lost a more alarming 25 percent (although, as Mediaweek notes, November is an off month for the category as a whole).
In fact, that 25 percent slide is about what you'd expect to see after a 50 percent price hike, and the numbers will probably only get worse. I'd guess a lot of people who bought IT or L&S in the last two weeks just tossed it in the shopping cart without even checking the price. Once they realize they can no longer get two Bauer magazines for the price of one People, a lot of them won't come back.






