Home > Views > Blogs > Mixed Media > Burkle 'Sexy'? Not to 'Star' Readers
EMAIL
PRINT
RSS
SHARE
TEXT SIZE:
SHARE
Send a copy to me

Separate multiple email addresses (max 20) with commas.

0/1500

Main
Rove, Moulitsas Play to Type in 'New...   Showtime Hit with Name Suit; HBO Bac...
Nov 19 2007 6:20PM EST

Burkle 'Sexy'? Not to 'Star' Readers

Did Star magazine bury the results of an online poll to spare its future owner embarrassment?

Last week, the New York Post reported that Yucaipa Cos. chairman Ron Burkle had been selected to figure prominently in a feature about the "sexiest billionaire bachelors," all of whom were drawn from the ranks of the Forbes billionaires list. The feature was seen internally as "a big corporate suck-up" on the part of American Media chief David Pecker, who is negotiating to merge his company with Burkle's Source Interlink, and hoping to finagle a job for himself at the merged company. (AMI's spokesman insists Pecker had nothing to do with the story.)

On Thursday night, a companion poll went live on starmagazine.com featuring the six billionaires from the magazine and 24 others, with readers asked to choose their five favorites. When I checked a few hours after it went up, Burkle was polling at under 1 percent. But by Friday night, the results page had disappeared, replaced by a "thanks for your participation" message.

It makes sense. When a guy's about to drop a billion dollars ($1.2 billion, actually), the last thing you want to do is puncture his ego.


UPDATE, 7:59 p.m.: Apparently, putting the results up online in the first place was a mistake; an AMI spokesman says the plan was, and is, to publish them in next week's issue.

See more in

Loading...

Add Your Comment

Required fields are marked with an asterisk (*)
Add a comment

Archive

Previous
Nov
2008
Next


Also in Portfolio.com
Most Read
Most Emailed
Recently Commented