Rather and Regan: A Parallel of Paranoia

A towering media figure files a breach-of-contract suit after being forced out of a job, claiming the ouster was part of a conspiracy to curry favor with top Republicans.
Sound familiar? That's the picture Judith Regan painted in her $100 million lawsuit filed earlier this week, and it's the same one Dan Rather depicted in his $70 million complaint against CBS.
Regan thinks News Corp. wanted to tar her as a louche anti-Semite to discredit anything she might have to say about Bernie Kerik and limit its effects on Rudy Giuliani's presidential prospects. Rather contends Viacom offered him up as a sacrifice to appease the White House after calling attention to George Bush's spotty National Guard record during the 2004 election.
What's so bizarre about both lawsuits is the superfluousness of the conspiracy theories they contain. Rather says he was denied regular airtime on 60 Minutes; Regan says she has a witness who swears she never said boo about the Jews. If they can prove those claims, they win. End of story. As for why their employers chose to hustle them out prematurely, how is wanting to turn the page on a corporate humiliation not an adequate motive?
If anything, the inclusion of paranoid theories about the corporate media/Republican party axis actually discredits both complaints. If Rather and Regan had stuck to the provable facts, they'd be seen as wronged workers out to get their contractual due. Instead, they look like angry, delusional obsessives desperate to get even with The System for the way it allowed two long and distinguished careers to end in a pair of punchlines. Unfortunately, there's no legal remedy for public disgrace.
UPDATE: Here's a fantastic close reading of Regan's suit. "The complaint is signed by attorney Brian Kerr, of New York's 175-lawyer Dreier firm, but it has an astoundingly unfiltered quality to it." Also, it "reads like one of those humor pieces in The New Yorker, where it not-so-gradually dawns on the reader that the narrator is out of his gourd. Even though you're hearing only one side of the story, that's enough to make up your mind against the griper."
-----
Photographs by Getty Images
- Late Breaks: 'WSJ' vs. 'NYT,' Layoff Roundup, more
- Nov 21 2008 4:48PM EST
- Duly Quoted: Was 'WSJ' a Big Fat Waste of Dough?
- Nov 21 2008 4:10PM EST
- How Dividend Cut Puts NYT's Future in Play
- Nov 21 2008 10:52AM EST
- Idle Chatter: Ted's Sales; Angelina's Leverage
- Nov 21 2008 8:37AM EST
- Late Breaks: Slimming Down AP, and Fat Kids
- Nov 20 2008 5:39PM EST
- New York Times Co. Slashes Dividend
- Nov 20 2008 4:17PM EST
- Oprah Headmistress to Drop Suit Against Huffpo
- Nov 20 2008 2:43PM EST
- News Corp. Re-ups Ailes as Fox News Chief
- Nov 20 2008 1:29PM EST
- Garfield: There's No Future Model for Online News
- Nov 20 2008 11:23AM EST
- Idle Chatter: Bad Day to Own Media Stock
- Nov 20 2008 8:35AM EST
- Late Breaks: Steve Jobs Blogger Gagged, more
- Nov 19 2008 5:36PM EST
- AMI Chief Asks Employees to Back Auto Bailout
- Nov 19 2008 2:49PM EST
- 'PC Magazine' Crossing the Digital-Only Frontier
- Nov 19 2008 12:25PM EST
- Number Crunch: Downsizing at the Business Mags
- Nov 19 2008 11:10AM EST
- Idle Chatter: 'Cottage' Carnage at Time Inc., more
- Nov 19 2008 8:20AM EST
Categories
Links
- Contact Me
- News After Newspapers
- Romenesko

- Gawker

- Ad Age

- WWD's Memo Pad

- Keith Kelly

- NYT Media

- Jon Fine

- TVNewser

- Magazine Death Pool

- HuffPo Media

- Radar

- Galleycat

- Book Standard

- News Hounds

- Newsbusters

- Jezebel

- CBS Public Eye

- Editor & Publisher

- Hollywood Wiretap

- The Media Pundit

- FAIR

- I Want Media

- Viral Video

- Nikki Finke

- MediaFile

- Silicon Alley Insider

- Paid Content

- Valleywag

- Channel '08 -- Campaign Ads

- Cover Awards

- Talking Biz News

- SI.com - Richard Deitsch

- Gapper Blog - Media

- Jon Friedman










