Recent Blog Posts
-
Nicked Off: The Curious Path of Gawker's Chief
Oct 11 20102:39 pm EDT -
Conde Nast Closing 'Portfolio'
Apr 27 200910:02 am EDT -
Newspaper Circ: 'WSJ' Gains as 'NY Post' Tumbles
Apr 27 20099:32 am EDT -
Idle Chatter: The Prognosis for Newspapers, more
Apr 27 20098:55 am EDT -
Late Breaks: MySpace, NYT, 'New York'
Apr 24 20094:01 pm EDT -
Nostalgia, Entitlement and Murdoch's 'Journal'
Apr 24 20094:00 pm EDT -
Huffpo's Lerer on the 'New and Better' Journalism
Apr 24 200912:44 pm EDT -
Ailes Heats Up Cold Spring with Newspaper War
Apr 24 200912:33 pm EDT -
Happy Friday. Now Watch This.
Apr 24 200910:24 am EDT -
Idle Chatter: NPR Cutbacks, Jon Meacham, more
Apr 24 20098:50 am EDT
Links
- SI.com - Richard Deitsch

- I Want Media

- Editor & Publisher

- Galleycat

- Magazine Death Pool

- WWD's Memo Pad

- Talking Biz News

- Media Nation

- Hollywood Wiretap

- FAIR

- The Media Pundit

- NYT Media

- MediaFile

- Gapper Blog - Media

- Jezebel

- The Business Insider

- Viral Video

- Ad Age

- Newsbusters

- News After Newspapers

- Nikki Finke

- News Hounds

- NY Observer media page

- Valleywag

- Paid Content

- TVNewser

- Nieman Journalism Lab

- Romenesko

- Keith Kelly

- Contact Me

- Cover Awards

- Tyndall Report

- Jon Friedman

- Gawker

- Jon Fine

- Media Shift

- HuffPo Media

Let's Discuss: 'Time' Person of the Year
Who should be Time's person of the year for 2007? The newsweekly will host a panel later today to debate that question, and if past years are any guide, the actual designee-to-be will probably surface in the discussion. So let's consider the possibilities.
First, a couple things to bear in mind:
The person of the year doesn't have to be a person. In previous years, it's been a group of people ("The Whistleblowers," 2004), an abstract figure ("The American Soldier," 2003), a pronoun that's really a concept ("You," 2006) and even a device ("The Computer," 1982).
The person of the year is meant to be the most influential person/group/entity/concept of the year, but the designation is value-neutral -- at least in theory. Past POYs have included Richard Nixon, Ayatollah Khomeini and Adolf Hitler. In practice, Time has seemed to favor feel-good POYs in recent years, possibly because it's easier to sell the issue to advertisers. Hence Rudy Giuliani in 2001 instead of Osama bin Laden.
And now for the contenders:
Pervez Musharraf
This would be something of a throwback choice -- an actual individual rather than a group or concept, a dictator rather than a hero. Picking Musharraf would reflect an emerging consensus that Pakistan -- not Iraq or Iran -- is the make-or-break foreign policy issue of the next few years. On the other hand, even though POY is supposed to be value-neutral, Time editors might worry that bestowing the title on Musharraf so soon after he declared emergency rule might be seen as an endorsement of his power-grab.
Rupert Murdoch
It's been a banner year for Murdoch, with his acquisition of The Wall Street Journal and the launch of Fox Business. And his $580 million purchase of MySpace in 2005 put him right in the middle of the year's biggest media story, social networking. While a media mogul might seem like an insidery choice, past POYs have included Ted Turner and Amazon's Jeff Bezos.
The Dissenters
A politician POY is unlikely this year, since next year's selection will almost certainly be the winner of the presidential election. (The last time a new president wasn't named POY was 1988, when "Endangered Earth" beat out George H.W. Bush; before that, it was 1968, although Nixon was recognized after his 1972 victory.) If it's to be a political cover, I'd guess we'll see some kind of concept package expressing the national mood. Thus: "The Dissenters": the figures who give voice to our exasperation with the Bush Administration. Time likes three-person tableaux, so let's say Stephen Colbert, Keith Olbermann and perhaps Eli Pariser of MoveOn.org, or Arianna Huffington? Or forget "The Dissenters" -- wrap them in a flag and call it "The New Patriots."
I know I'm missing obvious possibilities here -- is there someone who could serve as the face of the sub-prime crisis? -- but I'm out of ideas, and rather than ask all my co-workers to help me look smart, I figured I'd crowdsource this one. If you have suggestions, put 'em in the comments, and if I can I'll bounce them off the panelists.
UPDATE: It's looking like Al Gore might have it wrapped up.
Comments
If you are commenting using a Facebook account, your profile information may be displayed with your comment depending on your privacy settings. By leaving the 'Post to Facebook' box selected, your comment will be published to your Facebook profile in addition to the space below.




