Recent Blog Posts
-
Nicked Off: The Curious Path of Gawker's Chief
Oct 11 20102:39 pm EDT -
Conde Nast Closing 'Portfolio'
Apr 27 200910:02 am EDT -
Newspaper Circ: 'WSJ' Gains as 'NY Post' Tumbles
Apr 27 20099:32 am EDT -
Idle Chatter: The Prognosis for Newspapers, more
Apr 27 20098:55 am EDT -
Late Breaks: MySpace, NYT, 'New York'
Apr 24 20094:01 pm EDT -
Nostalgia, Entitlement and Murdoch's 'Journal'
Apr 24 20094:00 pm EDT -
Huffpo's Lerer on the 'New and Better' Journalism
Apr 24 200912:44 pm EDT -
Ailes Heats Up Cold Spring with Newspaper War
Apr 24 200912:33 pm EDT -
Happy Friday. Now Watch This.
Apr 24 200910:24 am EDT -
Idle Chatter: NPR Cutbacks, Jon Meacham, more
Apr 24 20098:50 am EDT
Links
- SI.com - Richard Deitsch

- I Want Media

- Editor & Publisher

- Galleycat

- Magazine Death Pool

- WWD's Memo Pad

- Talking Biz News

- Media Nation

- Hollywood Wiretap

- FAIR

- The Media Pundit

- NYT Media

- MediaFile

- Gapper Blog - Media

- Jezebel

- The Business Insider

- Viral Video

- Ad Age

- Newsbusters

- News After Newspapers

- Nikki Finke

- News Hounds

- NY Observer media page

- Valleywag

- Paid Content

- TVNewser

- Nieman Journalism Lab

- Romenesko

- Keith Kelly

- Contact Me

- Cover Awards

- Tyndall Report

- Jon Friedman

- Gawker

- Jon Fine

- Media Shift

- HuffPo Media

Will New-Look 'Newsweek' Downsize?
Newsweek unveils its new design today. Okay, the redesign was actually unveiled Monday, but I haven't written about it yet because, well, there's not much to say -- at least not about the design per se.
Unlike Time, which underwent a major and widely touted makeover after Richard Stengel took over as editor, Newsweek opted for the low-key incrementalist approach -- more "refinement than revolution," as Jon Meacham puts it in his editor's letter.
Mixed in with the self-congratulations is a thinly-veiled critique of Stengel, both for making Time more browsable and for talking too much about the need to be more browsable.
"Some people in our business believe print should emulate the Internet, filling pages with short, Weblike bites of information. We disagree," Meacham writes. "[I]t is very tempting to make grand declarations, but I am going to try to resist. Hyperbole does not get us very far."
Well, I disagree with Meacham's disagreement. Yes, Time probably traded away some of its heft by giving more space over to charticles, photos and pop-culture tidbits. But heft doesn't count for a lot when no one's reading you. Since Time changed its format, I find I'm more inclined to open the magazine as soon as it arrives and page through it, while Newsweek spends a lot of time gathering dust in my in-box.
Of course, that's also a function of another Time innovation -- the shift to a Friday on-sale date. That was a canny acknowledgment of the shifting function of the newsweekly, from information to entertainment. Newsweek, meanwhile, is still trying to compete for its readers' time during the busiest part of the workweek. It's another missed opportunity.
But there's another change I don't think Newsweek will be able to put off much longer: a large reduction in rate base, or the minimum circulation guaranteed to advertisers. Since January, when Time lowered its rate base from 4 million to 3.25 million (while offering advertisers the choice to buy by audience rather than circulation), Newsweek has been almost on par with its rival in terms of size. But I've been hearing rumors that the magazine is preparing to announce a substantial cut in its 3.1 million rate base, probably by the end of the year. One factor said to be influencing the thinking of Newsweek executives is the success of an experiment conducted with Newsweek International, which saw an immediate improvement to its bottom line after cutting rate base two years ago.
I haven't heard back yet from a Newsweek spokeswoman, but Greg Osberg, the magazine's worldwide publisher, recently told Mediaweek that a rate base reduction is not out of the question.
Comments
If you are commenting using a Facebook account, your profile information may be displayed with your comment depending on your privacy settings. By leaving the 'Post to Facebook' box selected, your comment will be published to your Facebook profile in addition to the space below.





