Recent Blog Posts
-
Conde Nast Closing 'Portfolio'
Apr 27 200910:02 am EDT -
Newspaper Circ: 'WSJ' Gains as 'NY Post' Tumbles
Apr 27 20099:32 am EDT -
Idle Chatter: The Prognosis for Newspapers, more
Apr 27 20098:55 am EDT -
Late Breaks: MySpace, NYT, 'New York'
Apr 24 20094:01 pm EDT -
Nostalgia, Entitlement and Murdoch's 'Journal'
Apr 24 20094:00 pm EDT
Links
- SI.com - Richard Deitsch

- I Want Media

- Editor & Publisher

- Galleycat

- Magazine Death Pool

- WWD's Memo Pad

- Talking Biz News

- Media Nation

- Hollywood Wiretap

- FAIR

- The Media Pundit

- NYT Media

- MediaFile

- Gapper Blog - Media

- Jezebel

- The Business Insider

- Viral Video

- Ad Age

- Newsbusters

- News After Newspapers

- Nikki Finke

- News Hounds

- NY Observer media page

- Valleywag

- Paid Content

- TVNewser

- Nieman Journalism Lab

- Romenesko

- Keith Kelly

- Contact Me

- Cover Awards

- Tyndall Report

- Jon Friedman

- Gawker

- Jon Fine

- Media Shift

- HuffPo Media

Will Rivals' Price Hike Rescue 'OK'?
Keith Kelly reports that OK magazine (I refuse to use the exclamation point), having burned through $85 million in two years, is on the verge of profitability.
"The days of investments are coming to an end," says editorial director Paul Ashford.
But Kelly's story omits what must be one of the major reasons for OK's rosy projections: Next week, both In Touch and Life & Style will be raising their cover price from $1.99 to $2.99, the same as OK's.
The two Bauer Publishing-owned tabloids combine to sell around 2 million copies on the newsstand in a good week, but the price hike is going to take out a big chunk of that. If OK, offering a more expensively-produced magazine at the same price, can't lure away a couple hundred thousand of those readers, they ought to close up shop and go back to England.
"I think this price hike will save them," a veteran glossy-tabloid executive told me recently. "If I were [OK owner] Richard Desmond, I'd dump a ton of money into marketing right after it happens."






