Recent Blog Posts
-
Conde Nast Closing 'Portfolio'
Apr 27 200910:02 am EDT -
Newspaper Circ: 'WSJ' Gains as 'NY Post' Tumbles
Apr 27 20099:32 am EDT -
Idle Chatter: The Prognosis for Newspapers, more
Apr 27 20098:55 am EDT -
Late Breaks: MySpace, NYT, 'New York'
Apr 24 20094:01 pm EDT -
Nostalgia, Entitlement and Murdoch's 'Journal'
Apr 24 20094:00 pm EDT
Links
- SI.com - Richard Deitsch

- I Want Media

- Editor & Publisher

- Galleycat

- Magazine Death Pool

- WWD's Memo Pad

- Talking Biz News

- Media Nation

- Hollywood Wiretap

- FAIR

- The Media Pundit

- NYT Media

- MediaFile

- Gapper Blog - Media

- Jezebel

- The Business Insider

- Viral Video

- Ad Age

- Newsbusters

- News After Newspapers

- Nikki Finke

- News Hounds

- NY Observer media page

- Valleywag

- Paid Content

- TVNewser

- Nieman Journalism Lab

- Romenesko

- Keith Kelly

- Contact Me

- Cover Awards

- Tyndall Report

- Jon Friedman

- Gawker

- Jon Fine

- Media Shift

- HuffPo Media

How's That, Again?
Fox's success boils down to its ability to convey an attitude. It proclaims a gung-ho, can-do, we're-all-in-this-together-America spirit.
-MarketWatch's Jon Friedman, Oct. 12, 2007.
Uh, has Jon Friedman ever watched Fox News? "We're all in this together" is the exact opposite of the network's ethos. It's more "we God-fearing conservatives are in this together, against you 'secular progressive' hippies, who hate America and want six-year-olds to study the Koran in school and get gay-married."
And by the way, Red Eye co-host Bill Schulz's on-air quip "We're a very conservative news channel" was evidently meant as a joke -- it was part of a segment on the upcoming CFA-Iams cat show -- but it still represented, so far as I know, the first time a full-time Fox News employee has publicly acknowledged the network's political orientation. Too bad it aired at 2 a.m.






