Sign In
SHARE
Why Media Matters is Good for Everyone
Can the success of an ultra-partisan pressure group possibly be a good thing for objective journalism? My answer is yes.
The group I have in mind is Media Matters, which has got conservative panties in a bunch after recent campaigns against Rush Limbaugh, Bill O'Reilly and Don Imus.
Jonah Goldberg calls the three-year-old entity "a cog in the larger Vast Left-Wing Conspiracy." Blogger Gary Gross calls it "essentially the Clinton War Room on steroids." I don't dispute either of those characterizations, but I also think Media Matters is pretty brilliant (and certainly not the "most vicious element in our society today," as O'Reilly would have it.)
Its brilliance lies in its canny grasp of the information economy. Journalists like me would like to know everything interesting or potentially scandalous that O'Reilly, Limbaugh, Sean Hannity, etc. says, but don't have time to listen to all their shows or read all the transcripts. So Media Matters hires an army of interns to do it, then offers us the choicest tidbits, packaged in left-wing cant, which we're free to keep or discard as we like. (I don't have to think Bill O'Reilly is an evil racist to find it funny and newsworthy that he was amazed to see black people behaving themselves at a restaurant.)
There's nothing unique about this, by the way. Newsbusters has been doing the same thing for the other side since 2005, and there are also groups like FAIR and ThinkProgress. Media Matters just happens to have been getting the big scores lately.
Right-wingers can accuse Media Matters of Stalinist tactics and fraud all they want. But information's a market. And when conservatives bitch about the success a group like Media Matters is having in that market, they sound an awful lot like their own caricatured versions of the liberals who can't stand to see anyone profit from the free enterprise system.
Loading...
Thank you for registering as a Portfolio.com Insider. Your comment has been added.
Create Your Public Profile
- Conde Nast Closing 'Portfolio'
- Apr 27 2009 10:02AM EDT
- Newspaper Circ: 'WSJ' Gains as 'NY Post' Tumbles
- Apr 27 2009 9:32AM EDT
- Idle Chatter: The Prognosis for Newspapers, more
- Apr 27 2009 8:55AM EDT
- Late Breaks: MySpace, NYT, 'New York'
- Apr 24 2009 4:01PM EDT
- Nostalgia, Entitlement and Murdoch's 'Journal'
- Apr 24 2009 4:00PM EDT
- Huffpo's Lerer on the 'New and Better' Journalism
- Apr 24 2009 12:44PM EDT
- Ailes Heats Up Cold Spring with Newspaper War
- Apr 24 2009 12:33PM EDT
- Happy Friday. Now Watch This.
- Apr 24 2009 10:24AM EDT
- Idle Chatter: NPR Cutbacks, Jon Meacham, more
- Apr 24 2009 8:50AM EDT
- Late Breaks: Twitter and the 'Times,' more
- Apr 23 2009 5:59PM EDT
- CNN Partner's Polling Finds CNN Fair, Balanced
- Apr 23 2009 4:10PM EDT
- 'Scientific American' Editor Out in Reorg
- Apr 23 2009 3:19PM EDT
- Idle Chatter: MySpace, Nerve, 'Millionaire,' more
- Apr 23 2009 8:20AM EDT
- Late Breaks: 'Observer' Editor Resigns, more
- Apr 22 2009 4:15PM EDT
- One Marriage, One Memoir, Two Opinions
- Apr 22 2009 2:31PM EDT
Archive
Categories
Links
- Contact Me
- News After Newspapers
- Romenesko
- Gawker
- Ad Age
- WWD's Memo Pad
- Keith Kelly
- NYT Media
- Jon Fine
- TVNewser
- Magazine Death Pool
- HuffPo Media
- Galleycat
- News Hounds
- Newsbusters
- Jezebel
- Editor & Publisher
- Hollywood Wiretap
- The Media Pundit
- FAIR
- I Want Media
- Viral Video
- Nikki Finke
- MediaFile
- The Business Insider
- Paid Content
- Valleywag
- Cover Awards
- Talking Biz News
- SI.com - Richard Deitsch
- Gapper Blog - Media
- Jon Friedman
- Nieman Journalism Lab
- NY Observer media page
- Media Shift
- Tyndall Report
- Media Nation
