Recent Blog Posts
-
Conde Nast Closing 'Portfolio'
Apr 27 200910:02 am EDT -
Newspaper Circ: 'WSJ' Gains as 'NY Post' Tumbles
Apr 27 20099:32 am EDT -
Idle Chatter: The Prognosis for Newspapers, more
Apr 27 20098:55 am EDT -
Late Breaks: MySpace, NYT, 'New York'
Apr 24 20094:01 pm EDT -
Nostalgia, Entitlement and Murdoch's 'Journal'
Apr 24 20094:00 pm EDT
Links
- SI.com - Richard Deitsch

- I Want Media

- Editor & Publisher

- Galleycat

- Magazine Death Pool

- WWD's Memo Pad

- Talking Biz News

- Media Nation

- Hollywood Wiretap

- FAIR

- The Media Pundit

- NYT Media

- MediaFile

- Gapper Blog - Media

- Jezebel

- The Business Insider

- Viral Video

- Ad Age

- Newsbusters

- News After Newspapers

- Nikki Finke

- News Hounds

- NY Observer media page

- Valleywag

- Paid Content

- TVNewser

- Nieman Journalism Lab

- Romenesko

- Keith Kelly

- Contact Me

- Cover Awards

- Tyndall Report

- Jon Friedman

- Gawker

- Jon Fine

- Media Shift

- HuffPo Media

FT.com Goes Free, Sort Of
Felix Salmon has already decreed that the Financial Times will stop charging for web content, but the paper still seems to be in denial.
Today, FT announces a somewhat clever new system whereby visitors to the site will only be required to pay if they make more than 30 page views per month.
This is FT's answer to the Google problem: that subscription-only articles are effectively invisible to Google, which drives an obscene proportion of traffic, and which even regular readers of a newspaper's website will often use as a shortcut to find stories there.
Points to FT for creativity, and for recognizing that its core readers are probably expensing their subscriptions anyway, and thus don't mind the cost. (Or perhaps I should say: They mind the cost less than the hassle.) Still, like Playboy.com's redesign, it seems like a half measure, a temporary way-station en route to an all-free model. I suspect Felix would agree.






