Recent Blog Posts
-
Conde Nast Closing 'Portfolio'
Apr 27 200910:02 am EDT -
Newspaper Circ: 'WSJ' Gains as 'NY Post' Tumbles
Apr 27 20099:32 am EDT -
Idle Chatter: The Prognosis for Newspapers, more
Apr 27 20098:55 am EDT -
Late Breaks: MySpace, NYT, 'New York'
Apr 24 20094:01 pm EDT -
Nostalgia, Entitlement and Murdoch's 'Journal'
Apr 24 20094:00 pm EDT
Links
- SI.com - Richard Deitsch

- I Want Media

- Editor & Publisher

- Galleycat

- Magazine Death Pool

- WWD's Memo Pad

- Talking Biz News

- Media Nation

- Hollywood Wiretap

- FAIR

- The Media Pundit

- NYT Media

- MediaFile

- Gapper Blog - Media

- Jezebel

- The Business Insider

- Viral Video

- Ad Age

- Newsbusters

- News After Newspapers

- Nikki Finke

- News Hounds

- NY Observer media page

- Valleywag

- Paid Content

- TVNewser

- Nieman Journalism Lab

- Romenesko

- Keith Kelly

- Contact Me

- Cover Awards

- Tyndall Report

- Jon Friedman

- Gawker

- Jon Fine

- Media Shift

- HuffPo Media

What's Indecent: Nipplegate or 'Gossip Girl'?
From the "Will nobody think of the children?" department:
CBS is battling in court to get back the $550,000 fine it paid after Janet Jackson flashed one breast for a split-second on national TV.
Meanwhile, over on the CW network, which CBS half-owns, teenagers are drinking martinis, smoking pot, having sex and wearing Prada on the new series Gossip Girl. "It's aspirational," says Cecily von Zigesar, who wrote the books on which the show is based. She's referring to the fashions, not the alcohol, drugs and sex. Got that, 14-year-olds? Covet the styles, abhor the lifestyle.
And unlike CBS, which had no advance knowledge of Jackson's stunt, the CW knows exactly what's going to happen on every episode of Gossip Girl.
Can someone explain this to me? If I were a parent, I'd much rather have my adolescent kid catch a brief, blurry nipple-flash than watch glamorized versions of her peers getting wasted and laid. But in the F.C.C.'s view, the former is indecency, and the latter is just entertainment.






