Recent Blog Posts
-
Nicked Off: The Curious Path of Gawker's Chief
Oct 11 20102:39 pm EDT -
Conde Nast Closing 'Portfolio'
Apr 27 200910:02 am EDT -
Newspaper Circ: 'WSJ' Gains as 'NY Post' Tumbles
Apr 27 20099:32 am EDT -
Idle Chatter: The Prognosis for Newspapers, more
Apr 27 20098:55 am EDT -
Late Breaks: MySpace, NYT, 'New York'
Apr 24 20094:01 pm EDT -
Nostalgia, Entitlement and Murdoch's 'Journal'
Apr 24 20094:00 pm EDT -
Huffpo's Lerer on the 'New and Better' Journalism
Apr 24 200912:44 pm EDT -
Ailes Heats Up Cold Spring with Newspaper War
Apr 24 200912:33 pm EDT -
Happy Friday. Now Watch This.
Apr 24 200910:24 am EDT -
Idle Chatter: NPR Cutbacks, Jon Meacham, more
Apr 24 20098:50 am EDT
Links
- SI.com - Richard Deitsch

- I Want Media

- Editor & Publisher

- Galleycat

- Magazine Death Pool

- WWD's Memo Pad

- Talking Biz News

- Media Nation

- Hollywood Wiretap

- FAIR

- The Media Pundit

- NYT Media

- MediaFile

- Gapper Blog - Media

- Jezebel

- The Business Insider

- Viral Video

- Ad Age

- Newsbusters

- News After Newspapers

- Nikki Finke

- News Hounds

- NY Observer media page

- Valleywag

- Paid Content

- TVNewser

- Nieman Journalism Lab

- Romenesko

- Keith Kelly

- Contact Me

- Cover Awards

- Tyndall Report

- Jon Friedman

- Gawker

- Jon Fine

- Media Shift

- HuffPo Media

Marketing a Kids' Film About Atheism
Someone tell James Dobson he can retire. Hollywood has called off its war on God.
I've been wondering for a while how New Line Cinema would handle the unambiguous anti-religious message of His Dark Materials, the fantasy trilogy whose first installment, The Golden Compass, will be released in December. If Harry Potter and The Da Vinci Code could inspire protests and boycott threats from Christian groups, how much moreso books that explicitly tell their youthful readers that it's okay not to believe in God?
Now we have our answer: The studio is caving.
According to The New York Times, "the books' religion-touched heavies were massaged into more generalized, authoritarian villains" in the adaptation of The Golden Compass, while Kidman, who is Catholic, insists she wouldn't participate in a movie that was anti-Church.
I discovered His Dark Materials a few years ago, after a mention of the series in The New Yorker. The books may not be anti-Catholic per se -- they are largely set in a parallel universe where Calvinist doctrine is ascendant -- but they are as anti-religion as you can get. The heroes include a pair of gay angels, a band of witches, and a lapsed nun who traded her vows for a life of sex and science; among the villains is a zealous priest who doubles as an assassin. A successful resolution of the plot requires God to be euthanized and an adolescent girl to give into sexual temptation.
They're pretty great books.
But New Line has evidently chosen to duck the controversy rather than embrace it. Why? I'm guessing the marketing folks have been thinking a lot about The Chronicles of Narnia: The Lion, The Witch and the Wardrobe, which has earned three quarters of a billion dollars worldwide, a tally that was widely credited, correctly or not, to the enthusiastic embrace of evangelicals.
But Materials is no Narnia. The books' theology (atheology?) is integral to their appeal; without it, they're just stories about talking bears and a plucky street urchin. And it's not as though controversy doesn't also sell tickets. Just look at The Da Vinci code which managed a similar worldwide take despite terrible reviews. Shouldn't a tie go to the author?
Comments
If you are commenting using a Facebook account, your profile information may be displayed with your comment depending on your privacy settings. By leaving the 'Post to Facebook' box selected, your comment will be published to your Facebook profile in addition to the space below.




