Recent Blog Posts
-
Nicked Off: The Curious Path of Gawker's Chief
Oct 11 20102:39 pm EDT -
Conde Nast Closing 'Portfolio'
Apr 27 200910:02 am EDT -
Newspaper Circ: 'WSJ' Gains as 'NY Post' Tumbles
Apr 27 20099:32 am EDT -
Idle Chatter: The Prognosis for Newspapers, more
Apr 27 20098:55 am EDT -
Late Breaks: MySpace, NYT, 'New York'
Apr 24 20094:01 pm EDT -
Nostalgia, Entitlement and Murdoch's 'Journal'
Apr 24 20094:00 pm EDT -
Huffpo's Lerer on the 'New and Better' Journalism
Apr 24 200912:44 pm EDT -
Ailes Heats Up Cold Spring with Newspaper War
Apr 24 200912:33 pm EDT -
Happy Friday. Now Watch This.
Apr 24 200910:24 am EDT -
Idle Chatter: NPR Cutbacks, Jon Meacham, more
Apr 24 20098:50 am EDT
Links
- SI.com - Richard Deitsch

- I Want Media

- Editor & Publisher

- Galleycat

- Magazine Death Pool

- WWD's Memo Pad

- Talking Biz News

- Media Nation

- Hollywood Wiretap

- FAIR

- The Media Pundit

- NYT Media

- MediaFile

- Gapper Blog - Media

- Jezebel

- The Business Insider

- Viral Video

- Ad Age

- Newsbusters

- News After Newspapers

- Nikki Finke

- News Hounds

- NY Observer media page

- Valleywag

- Paid Content

- TVNewser

- Nieman Journalism Lab

- Romenesko

- Keith Kelly

- Contact Me

- Cover Awards

- Tyndall Report

- Jon Friedman

- Gawker

- Jon Fine

- Media Shift

- HuffPo Media

Sportswriters Rooting For The Wrong Team

Michael Vick
It's as pathetic as it is predictable: Jock-sniffers across the country, content to hold their silence until after Michael Vick's guilt on dogfighting charges was firmly established, are sallying forth to make the case for why the Atlanta Falcons quarterback should be welcomed back to the NFL once he's served his time.
Mark Kriegel, FoxSports.com: "[W]hat would be accomplished by ending Vick's playing days?"
Mike Freeman, CBSSportsLine.com: "To be truthful, it wouldn't be fair to permanently ban Vick."
Patrick Reusse, Minneapolis Star Tribune: "Everyone involved in dogfighting is a sick puppy -- not just Vick. He'll have a year in a cell to think about that. And then [NFL commissioner Roger] Goodell should forget the grandstanding and allow Vick to return to the NFL immediately."
Et al, ad nauseam.
These and other pro-Vick columnists are largely relying on two arguments: that other NFL players charged or convicted with similar or worse crimes have been allowed to return, and that allowing people to redeem themselves is what this country is all about.
Jean-Jacques Taylor articulates this second line of logic in the Dallas Morning News: "[O]nce he's served his time and paid his debt to society, then he absolutely should be allowed to continue his NFL career. Anything else would be un-American."
Sorry, but no. Not allowing an ex-convict to vote or to rent an apartment is un-American. Not giving him a job that pays tens of millions of dollars a year and makes him an idol to millions of little kids—that's another story. The NFL is not the government. It has no obligation to treat a criminal who's served his time as equal to a non-criminal.
"What would be accomplished by ending Vick's playing days?" How about sending a message to other players? Seems like a useful thing to do, considering the vogue among NFL players for vicious fighting dogs.
As for the claim that Vick should get no worse punishment than other players who've broken the law, that sounds convincing only if you begin with the premise that Vick should be allowed back and work backward from there. If you want to clean up the NFL, you have to start somewhere. And if sportswriters want to shed their reputation as star-struck fanboys who identify way too closely with their subjects, they should stop making excuses for a guy like Vick.
Photo Credit: Simon Bruty/Sports Illustrated
Comments
If you are commenting using a Facebook account, your profile information may be displayed with your comment depending on your privacy settings. By leaving the 'Post to Facebook' box selected, your comment will be published to your Facebook profile in addition to the space below.




