Recent Blog Posts
-
The Times' Rorshach Geithner Story
Apr 27 20099:04am EDT -
Sinking Animal Spirits
Apr 27 20098:04am EDT -
Counter-cyclical Urban Policy
Apr 26 200910:04am EDT -
Be Your Own Counterfeiter
Apr 26 20099:04am EDT -
Being Tim Geithner
Apr 25 200912:04pm EDT -
Notes From a Press Conference Naif
Apr 25 20099:04am EDT -
What Good is the News?
Apr 25 20098:04am EDT -
Stressful Enough
Apr 24 20092:04pm EDT -
Not Regretting the Pound
Apr 24 20091:04pm EDT -
Introducing the New Ford Squeeze
Apr 24 20099:04am EDT -
Non-Economic Questions of the Day
Apr 24 20099:04am EDT -
The Stress Test Blind Alley
Apr 24 20098:04am EDT -
Happy Hour
Apr 23 20099:04pm EDT -
Recovery Without Rebalancing
Apr 23 20096:04pm EDT -
The Shape of Your Recession
Apr 23 20095:04pm EDT
Links
- Felix Salmon

- DealBreaker

- Ryan Avent: The Bellows

- The Epicurean Dealmaker

- Chris Anderson

- Ultimi Barbarorum

- MarketBeat

- Michelle Leder

- John Quiggin

- The Panelist

- Andrew Leonard

- Streetsblog

- Brad Setser

- Michael Mandel

- Financial Crookery

- Kash Mansori

- Dean Baker

- Calculated Risk

- Free Exchange

- Curbed

- Lance Knobel

- Econospeak

- Carbon Tax Center

- Overcoming Bias

- Mark Thoma

- Naked Capitalism

- Alphaville

- Barry Ritholtz

- Alexander Campbell

- The Bayesian Heresy

- Brad DeLong

- DealBook

- Greg Mankiw

- Deal Journal

- FP Passport

- Carl Bialik

- Marginal Revolution

- A Fistful of Euros

- Dan Gross

Profitable Citi
Wonder of wonders, Citigroup managed to report a profit for the first quarter of 2009. To a certain extent, the bank's results resembled those elsewhere -- trading gains and continued credit losses, adding up to a profit. But Citi's case was somewhat unique. The bank actually posted a negative EPS, which is a funny way to rack up a quarterly profit. And everyone's having a good chuckle at this:
Citigroup posted a $2.5 billion gain from accounting rules that allow companies to profit when their own creditworthiness declines. The rules reflect the possibility that a company could buy back its own liabilities at a discount, which under traditional accounting methods would result in a profit.
Just think, if Citi had done still worse it could have reported an even better quarter.
The bottom line is this, credit losses continue to grow, and so long as unemployment remains a problem (which it will, for at least another year), those losses will remain elevated. And while it's great that the banks are booking big trading gains, they likely won't be able to sustain the good times they had over the past three months. The pressure on these firms will not subside any time soon, and it will quickly become clear, probably within the next quarter, which banks will be able to earn their way out of trouble and which ones won't. Add to this the likely impact of the stress test results, due out May 4th, and it seems that things may be coming to a head for Citigroup. The question is -- is the government prepared?
/contributors/Ryan-Avent






