Recent Blog Posts
-
The Times' Rorshach Geithner Story
Apr 27 20099:26 am EDT -
Sinking Animal Spirits
Apr 27 20098:45 am EDT -
Counter-cyclical Urban Policy
Apr 26 200910:00 am EDT -
Be Your Own Counterfeiter
Apr 26 20099:36 am EDT -
Being Tim Geithner
Apr 25 200912:37 pm EDT -
Notes From a Press Conference Naif
Apr 25 20099:41 am EDT -
What Good is the News?
Apr 25 20098:32 am EDT -
Stressful Enough
Apr 24 20092:29 pm EDT -
Not Regretting the Pound
Apr 24 20091:09 pm EDT -
Introducing the New Ford Squeeze
Apr 24 20099:47 am EDT
Links
- Felix Salmon

- DealBreaker

- Ryan Avent: The Bellows

- The Epicurean Dealmaker

- Chris Anderson

- Ultimi Barbarorum

- MarketBeat

- Michelle Leder

- John Quiggin

- The Panelist

- Andrew Leonard

- Streetsblog

- Brad Setser

- Michael Mandel

- Financial Crookery

- Kash Mansori

- Dean Baker

- Calculated Risk

- Free Exchange

- Curbed

- Lance Knobel

- Econospeak

- Carbon Tax Center

- Overcoming Bias

- Mark Thoma

- Naked Capitalism

- Alphaville

- Barry Ritholtz

- Alexander Campbell

- The Bayesian Heresy

- Brad DeLong

- DealBook

- Greg Mankiw

- Deal Journal

- FP Passport

- Carl Bialik

- Marginal Revolution

- A Fistful of Euros

- Dan Gross

The Road to Rail
Today is a good day for fans of trains. Back during the construction of the stimulus package, the Obama administration successfully pushed to have $8 billion included for the development of high-speed rail systems, and he gave his transportation secretary two months to figure out what to do with it. Today, we have our answer. Money will be allocated via two rounds of applications. The first will direct funds toward projects with short turnaround times and good job creation metrics. The second round will focus on efforts to lay the groundwork for longer term projects. Eleven major corridors are eligible; the route from Los Angeles to Las Vegas is not among them.
Transportation experts are hailing the proposal as a good step forward, but cautioning that building high-speed rail on the same scale as the interstate highway system is going to require a little more than $8 billion. Presumably, this is a down payment on more significant funding to come. I also think it's a pretty useful heads up to the American public. "Get yourself ready to contemplate rail travel in America, because it's on the way," or some such thing.
Some will cry boondoggle; certainly GOP leaders attempted to do so in (falsely) claiming that the $8 billion was destined for Harry Reid's Mag-Lev line. This is a little silly. Rail in the northeastern corridor demonstrates that transit can become a crucial, even indispensable, part of the the infrastructure powering a regional economy. And most of the initial investments will be more about building a basic, functional passenger system, as opposed to bullet trains. Upgrades will involve getting trains to speeds around 120 miles per hour, improving reliability, increasing frequency, and so on. In a country where intercity highway and air travel have become burdensome, expensive, and plagued by congestion and delays, and where reduced carbon emissions is a priority, these are the minimum acceptable steps for the rail system.
And as was the case with highway construction, improved rail service will create its own demand. Faster, more reliable trains will attract riders and drive investment. New investment will attract new riders, and so on. The result will be a more balanced, reliable, redundant transportation system, that also happens to be more convenient and greener.
So feel good about this, taxpayers. It's money well spent.
/contributors/Ryan-Avent






