Recent Blog Posts
-
The Times' Rorshach Geithner Story
Apr 27 20099:04am EDT -
Sinking Animal Spirits
Apr 27 20098:04am EDT -
Counter-cyclical Urban Policy
Apr 26 200910:04am EDT -
Be Your Own Counterfeiter
Apr 26 20099:04am EDT -
Being Tim Geithner
Apr 25 200912:04pm EDT -
Notes From a Press Conference Naif
Apr 25 20099:04am EDT -
What Good is the News?
Apr 25 20098:04am EDT -
Stressful Enough
Apr 24 20092:04pm EDT -
Not Regretting the Pound
Apr 24 20091:04pm EDT -
Introducing the New Ford Squeeze
Apr 24 20099:04am EDT -
Non-Economic Questions of the Day
Apr 24 20099:04am EDT -
The Stress Test Blind Alley
Apr 24 20098:04am EDT -
Happy Hour
Apr 23 20099:04pm EDT -
Recovery Without Rebalancing
Apr 23 20096:04pm EDT -
The Shape of Your Recession
Apr 23 20095:04pm EDT
Links
- Felix Salmon

- DealBreaker

- Ryan Avent: The Bellows

- The Epicurean Dealmaker

- Chris Anderson

- Ultimi Barbarorum

- MarketBeat

- Michelle Leder

- John Quiggin

- The Panelist

- Andrew Leonard

- Streetsblog

- Brad Setser

- Michael Mandel

- Financial Crookery

- Kash Mansori

- Dean Baker

- Calculated Risk

- Free Exchange

- Curbed

- Lance Knobel

- Econospeak

- Carbon Tax Center

- Overcoming Bias

- Mark Thoma

- Naked Capitalism

- Alphaville

- Barry Ritholtz

- Alexander Campbell

- The Bayesian Heresy

- Brad DeLong

- DealBook

- Greg Mankiw

- Deal Journal

- FP Passport

- Carl Bialik

- Marginal Revolution

- A Fistful of Euros

- Dan Gross

Obligatory Tax Day Post
It's April 15th, and procrastinating Americans everywhere are rushing to get their tax returns in the mail (or frenetically trying to e-file). The normal spectacle of long lines at post offices that stay open until midnight for the occasion is being displaced today by the "tea parties" being held around the country to protest...something.
Taxes, I guess, although Barack Obama has yet to raise anything other than the cigarette tax (unless one considers deficit spending to be an increase in future taxes, in which case it's worth asking why these groups weren't teabagging the Bush White House). Some pundits have argued that the Republican brand is so tarnished that the party's fight against "socialism" has made socialism more popular (see Harold Meyerson). I wouldn't be surprised if a healthy percentage of Americans were relishing the opportunity to pay their taxes today, simply to thumb their noses at the Dick Armeys of the world.
In any event, a few thoughts on the paying of taxes. In this country, those who pay a lot in taxes are generally considered to be pretty fortunate (they've earned a lot of money), but in the midst of recession those paying a lot to the government are even more fortunate. This is a very blue collar recession, with job losses heavily concentrated in manufacturing and construction, while professionals -- and even financial workers -- have done pretty well. As Ed Glaeser recently wrote, the story of the ruined millionaire gets press coverage because it's rare, and therefore interesting; for the most part white collar professionals are still working, and still cutting checks to the IRS.
Another funny thing is the extent to which the American government goes out of its way to make paying taxes a real hassle. The government has (for the most part) your earnings information, and could send you a return (PDF) already filled out, which you could accept, sign, and mail back immediately if you didn't want to itemize or otherwise complicate your filing. And as the inevitable stories of tax cheats circulate this week it's worth observing that the Europeans do quite well raising revenue via the difficult-to-avoid, easy-for-citizens to pay VAT.
If there's one thing about the tax system that I find particularly galling, however, it's the government's failure to raise revenues in ways that would also serve to improve social welfare -- by taxing "bads" instead of "goods." Next time you're sitting in traffic, contemplate how congestion pricing could raise a lot of revenue and get rid of the traffic. Worried about obesity? Why not tax particularly unhealthy foods or drinks? It would raise money and save on health expenses, and it's less intrusive than outright bans on fatty foods or fast food chains. Something for Paul Volcker to consider while he's rewriting the tax code.
/contributors/Ryan-Avent






