Recent Blog Posts
-
The Times' Rorshach Geithner Story
Apr 27 20099:04am EDT -
Sinking Animal Spirits
Apr 27 20098:04am EDT -
Counter-cyclical Urban Policy
Apr 26 200910:04am EDT -
Be Your Own Counterfeiter
Apr 26 20099:04am EDT -
Being Tim Geithner
Apr 25 200912:04pm EDT -
Notes From a Press Conference Naif
Apr 25 20099:04am EDT -
What Good is the News?
Apr 25 20098:04am EDT -
Stressful Enough
Apr 24 20092:04pm EDT -
Not Regretting the Pound
Apr 24 20091:04pm EDT -
Introducing the New Ford Squeeze
Apr 24 20099:04am EDT -
Non-Economic Questions of the Day
Apr 24 20099:04am EDT -
The Stress Test Blind Alley
Apr 24 20098:04am EDT -
Happy Hour
Apr 23 20099:04pm EDT -
Recovery Without Rebalancing
Apr 23 20096:04pm EDT -
The Shape of Your Recession
Apr 23 20095:04pm EDT
Links
- Felix Salmon

- DealBreaker

- Ryan Avent: The Bellows

- The Epicurean Dealmaker

- Chris Anderson

- Ultimi Barbarorum

- MarketBeat

- Michelle Leder

- John Quiggin

- The Panelist

- Andrew Leonard

- Streetsblog

- Brad Setser

- Michael Mandel

- Financial Crookery

- Kash Mansori

- Dean Baker

- Calculated Risk

- Free Exchange

- Curbed

- Lance Knobel

- Econospeak

- Carbon Tax Center

- Overcoming Bias

- Mark Thoma

- Naked Capitalism

- Alphaville

- Barry Ritholtz

- Alexander Campbell

- The Bayesian Heresy

- Brad DeLong

- DealBook

- Greg Mankiw

- Deal Journal

- FP Passport

- Carl Bialik

- Marginal Revolution

- A Fistful of Euros

- Dan Gross

Unhelpful Metaphor of the Day, Poker Edition
Here's how Gerald Seib leads his WSJ column today:
In poker, there's a maneuver called "all-in," in which a player pushes all his chips to the center of the table in one big bet.
By that standard, President Barack Obama is conducting an all-in presidency.
He might have gotten the idea from Peter Nicholas, who says that Obama is "going all in, in poker terms". Or Deborah McAdams, who says that "in poker terms, the Treasury and the Fed have gone 'all in'". Or Mike Larson, who writes that "The Federal Reserve has done it now. In poker terms, it's gone 'all in'". Or Bob Pinzler, with a column on the economic crisis which uses "Going 'all in'" as a headline. Or Tim Reid, whose headline is "Barack Obama bets the farm in $4 trillion poker game". Etc etc.
Can we please retire this stunningly unhelpful meme? For one thing, it's responsible for altogether far too many scare quotes appearing in the mainstream media. And more to the point, the metaphor breaks down on a moment's reflection. Seib explains:
The budget attempts to launch at the outset most of the big policy initiatives the president has in mind for his term. It has money for a new health plan, envisions a cap-and-trade system for limiting so-called greenhouse gases, invests big money in alternative energy, and continues the flow of dollars into education started in the economic-stimulus package...
The Obama team could have made another choice; it could have been incremental, seeding in some items now, while promising to launch others over time.
Seib's basically saying here that all of Obama's big policy ideas are in the budget. But that's not what going all-in means, in poker. At the card table, going all-in means that you can't be bluffed or negotiated with: it's a bullying take-it-or-leave-it proposition. It also holds out the possibility that you can multiply your wealth at a stroke. It's the opposite of the long hard slog of grinding it out: it's a big and flashy gamble which leaves no room for strategy or even tactics. And while there are occasional government actions which might come close to fitting that bill -- Saddam Hussein's invasion of Kuwait, perhaps -- presenting a budget to Congress simply isn't one of them. Sorry.






