Recent Blog Posts
-
The $4.5 Billion Dollar Bank Run
Nov 07 201111:20 am EDT -
The Times' Rorshach Geithner Story
Apr 27 20099:26 am EDT -
Sinking Animal Spirits
Apr 27 20098:45 am EDT -
Counter-cyclical Urban Policy
Apr 26 200910:00 am EDT -
Be Your Own Counterfeiter
Apr 26 20099:36 am EDT -
Being Tim Geithner
Apr 25 200912:37 pm EDT -
Notes From a Press Conference Naif
Apr 25 20099:41 am EDT -
What Good is the News?
Apr 25 20098:32 am EDT -
Stressful Enough
Apr 24 20092:29 pm EDT -
Not Regretting the Pound
Apr 24 20091:09 pm EDT
Links
- Felix Salmon

- DealBreaker

- Ryan Avent: The Bellows

- The Epicurean Dealmaker

- Chris Anderson

- Ultimi Barbarorum

- MarketBeat

- Michelle Leder

- John Quiggin

- The Panelist

- Andrew Leonard

- Streetsblog

- Brad Setser

- Michael Mandel

- Financial Crookery

- Kash Mansori

- Dean Baker

- Calculated Risk

- Free Exchange

- Curbed

- Lance Knobel

- Econospeak

- Carbon Tax Center

- Overcoming Bias

- Mark Thoma

- Naked Capitalism

- Alphaville

- Barry Ritholtz

- Alexander Campbell

- The Bayesian Heresy

- Brad DeLong

- DealBook

- Greg Mankiw

- Deal Journal

- FP Passport

- Carl Bialik

- Marginal Revolution

- A Fistful of Euros

- Dan Gross

Caribbean Leverage Datapoint of the Day
Alea finds a speech from the governor of the Trinidadian central bank, which reveals that the country's largest financial-services company, Clico, had assets of $24 billion but that local regulators required it hold just $3 million in capital. "This is what I call real leverage," notes Alea, drily: "8000/1".
Shortly after the Stanford scandal broke, I had brunch with a Trinidadian friend who was worried that just about all of Trinidad's banks were offering CDs paying suspiciously high rates of interest -- not just in local currency, but in pounds and US dollars too.
After taking a quick look at what was going on, I reckoned that Trinidad's financial institutions, while they might have been unwise, were not criminal Ponzi schemes: the rates of interest they were paying, while high, weren't substantially higher than the Trinidadian government's own cost of funds. A Trinidadian depositor is naturally taking sovereign risk, and is being compensated for the fact that risk is high.
In general, it has never been riskier to have your deposits in a small country with its own currency -- just look what happened to Iceland. When the currency is pegged to the dollar or the euro (eg Trinidad or Latvia) you're not much safer: as we saw during the Asian crisis and in Argentina, currency pegs tend to disappear overnight in times of crisis.
It's also worth noting that most of Citibank's deposits are held in its foreign branches, are not insured by the FDIC, and are subject to the sovereign risk of the country where they're deposited. Those depositors aren't just taking Citibank risk: they're taking increasingly-perilous country risk on top. If they decide to move their money somewhere safer, that could be a serious liquidity problem for Citi. It has built up a global franchise by being seen as something of a safe haven in small countries. As that reputation wanes, the value of its franchise likely wanes with it.
Comments
If you are commenting using a Facebook account, your profile information may be displayed with your comment depending on your privacy settings. By leaving the 'Post to Facebook' box selected, your comment will be published to your Facebook profile in addition to the space below.




