Recent Blog Posts
-
The $4.5 Billion Dollar Bank Run
Nov 07 201111:20 am EDT -
The Times' Rorshach Geithner Story
Apr 27 20099:26 am EDT -
Sinking Animal Spirits
Apr 27 20098:45 am EDT -
Counter-cyclical Urban Policy
Apr 26 200910:00 am EDT -
Be Your Own Counterfeiter
Apr 26 20099:36 am EDT -
Being Tim Geithner
Apr 25 200912:37 pm EDT -
Notes From a Press Conference Naif
Apr 25 20099:41 am EDT -
What Good is the News?
Apr 25 20098:32 am EDT -
Stressful Enough
Apr 24 20092:29 pm EDT -
Not Regretting the Pound
Apr 24 20091:09 pm EDT
Links
- Felix Salmon

- DealBreaker

- Ryan Avent: The Bellows

- The Epicurean Dealmaker

- Chris Anderson

- Ultimi Barbarorum

- MarketBeat

- Michelle Leder

- John Quiggin

- The Panelist

- Andrew Leonard

- Streetsblog

- Brad Setser

- Michael Mandel

- Financial Crookery

- Kash Mansori

- Dean Baker

- Calculated Risk

- Free Exchange

- Curbed

- Lance Knobel

- Econospeak

- Carbon Tax Center

- Overcoming Bias

- Mark Thoma

- Naked Capitalism

- Alphaville

- Barry Ritholtz

- Alexander Campbell

- The Bayesian Heresy

- Brad DeLong

- DealBook

- Greg Mankiw

- Deal Journal

- FP Passport

- Carl Bialik

- Marginal Revolution

- A Fistful of Euros

- Dan Gross

How Scared Are Americans of Job Losses?
When I was a kid, it was called "Chinese whispers". Today I believe it's called "Telephone". Either way, it's a game where you start with something like this:
A majority of Americans, 55 percent, say they are just making ends meet, with more than 6 in 10 concerned that someone in their household might lose his job in the next year.
And it comes out, a few days later, like this:
Over six in ten Americans think that someone in their household will lose their job in the next year. That means six in ten people won't buy anything other than basics. The economy comes to a full halt even worse than now.
It's entirely reasonable for any household -- with the possible exception of the one at 1600 Pennsylvania Ave -- to be concerned about a possible redundancy this year. But that's a long stretch from positively believing that it is going to happen.
Right now, unemployment is at 7.6%, or 11.6 million individuals. Let's say the worst-case scenarios come true, and it spikes all the way up to 10%. That mean another 2.8 million people or so being added to the unemployment figures on a net basis; let's call it 4 million on a gross basis. There are 105 million households in the US. So even in a worst-case scenario, the chances of any given household suffering a job loss this year are slim. They're far too high, but they're slim.
What's more, not everybody who expects to lose their job immediately cuts back their spending to basics only. Some people do; others don't.
There are lots of reasons why people are cutting back spending right now, and fear of unemployment is only one of them -- and not even the most important one. The fact that many people don't have any more access to credit is surely a much bigger factor, and consumer-price deflation plays a very important role as well. So yes, the animal spirits of the US are weak. But they're not as weak as all that.
Comments
If you are commenting using a Facebook account, your profile information may be displayed with your comment depending on your privacy settings. By leaving the 'Post to Facebook' box selected, your comment will be published to your Facebook profile in addition to the space below.




