Recent Blog Posts
-
The $4.5 Billion Dollar Bank Run
Nov 07 201111:20 am EDT -
The Times' Rorshach Geithner Story
Apr 27 20099:26 am EDT -
Sinking Animal Spirits
Apr 27 20098:45 am EDT -
Counter-cyclical Urban Policy
Apr 26 200910:00 am EDT -
Be Your Own Counterfeiter
Apr 26 20099:36 am EDT -
Being Tim Geithner
Apr 25 200912:37 pm EDT -
Notes From a Press Conference Naif
Apr 25 20099:41 am EDT -
What Good is the News?
Apr 25 20098:32 am EDT -
Stressful Enough
Apr 24 20092:29 pm EDT -
Not Regretting the Pound
Apr 24 20091:09 pm EDT
Links
- Felix Salmon

- DealBreaker

- Ryan Avent: The Bellows

- The Epicurean Dealmaker

- Chris Anderson

- Ultimi Barbarorum

- MarketBeat

- Michelle Leder

- John Quiggin

- The Panelist

- Andrew Leonard

- Streetsblog

- Brad Setser

- Michael Mandel

- Financial Crookery

- Kash Mansori

- Dean Baker

- Calculated Risk

- Free Exchange

- Curbed

- Lance Knobel

- Econospeak

- Carbon Tax Center

- Overcoming Bias

- Mark Thoma

- Naked Capitalism

- Alphaville

- Barry Ritholtz

- Alexander Campbell

- The Bayesian Heresy

- Brad DeLong

- DealBook

- Greg Mankiw

- Deal Journal

- FP Passport

- Carl Bialik

- Marginal Revolution

- A Fistful of Euros

- Dan Gross

Why Nationalize in 2016?
The key number in Treasury's latest bank bailout plan is 7: that's the number of years that banks will have to repay the government before they get nationalized the preferred stock converts to common equity.
I think it's fair to say that those of us in favor of bank nationalization want nationalization now, when it would be very useful in terms of bringing down the banks' cost of funds and helping to erase the counterparty mistrust which is currently endemic to the system. Nationalization in seven years' time does no good to anybody. Indeed, I fully hope that if any bank were nationalized now, it would have been re-privatized by 2016.
In the meantime, the government's bailout money will be earning a healthy 9% interest rate for we taxpayers -- yet another liability which the banks are going to struggle to be able to meet. Hasn't the government learned its lesson from AIG? Burdening leveraged financial institutions with expensive new debt doesn't help them, it hurts them. Especially when they have no choice in whether or not to accept that burden.
. □Comments
If you are commenting using a Facebook account, your profile information may be displayed with your comment depending on your privacy settings. By leaving the 'Post to Facebook' box selected, your comment will be published to your Facebook profile in addition to the space below.




