Recent Blog Posts
-
The Times' Rorshach Geithner Story
Apr 27 20099:26 am EDT -
Sinking Animal Spirits
Apr 27 20098:45 am EDT -
Counter-cyclical Urban Policy
Apr 26 200910:00 am EDT -
Be Your Own Counterfeiter
Apr 26 20099:36 am EDT -
Being Tim Geithner
Apr 25 200912:37 pm EDT -
Notes From a Press Conference Naif
Apr 25 20099:41 am EDT -
What Good is the News?
Apr 25 20098:32 am EDT -
Stressful Enough
Apr 24 20092:29 pm EDT -
Not Regretting the Pound
Apr 24 20091:09 pm EDT -
Introducing the New Ford Squeeze
Apr 24 20099:47 am EDT
Links
- Felix Salmon

- DealBreaker

- Ryan Avent: The Bellows

- The Epicurean Dealmaker

- Chris Anderson

- Ultimi Barbarorum

- MarketBeat

- Michelle Leder

- John Quiggin

- The Panelist

- Andrew Leonard

- Streetsblog

- Brad Setser

- Michael Mandel

- Financial Crookery

- Kash Mansori

- Dean Baker

- Calculated Risk

- Free Exchange

- Curbed

- Lance Knobel

- Econospeak

- Carbon Tax Center

- Overcoming Bias

- Mark Thoma

- Naked Capitalism

- Alphaville

- Barry Ritholtz

- Alexander Campbell

- The Bayesian Heresy

- Brad DeLong

- DealBook

- Greg Mankiw

- Deal Journal

- FP Passport

- Carl Bialik

- Marginal Revolution

- A Fistful of Euros

- Dan Gross

Citigroup Datapoint of the Day
David Reilly looks at the yields on Citi's trust preferreds:
One issue of Citigroup trust preferred securities, or Trups, traded yesterday at about $6, compared with a face value of $25. At that price, the security, which pays a 6.5 percent interest rate, now yields more than 25 percent.
Earlier this morning, the issue actually traded at just $4.40, which implies a yield; it was last quoted at just over $5 -- this on a security which pays out $1.62 a year in interest. And as Reilly notes, the government would have to take a severe hit before those interest payments cease:
Trust preferreds are higher on the totem pole than all preferred stock, including the government's. So Uncle Sam would have to forgo his own dividend before the banks could put off paying the trust preferreds.
If the government doesn't get paid, a political firestorm surely would erupt. At a Congressional hearing last week, chiefs of eight big banks trumpeted their payment of dividends to the Treasury on schedule.
If you think that Citigroup is going to be rescued -- if you think that it's too big to fail or be nationalized -- then Reilly's right that the trust preferreds look really cheap right now. But the very fact that they're trading at such a low level means that the market is pricing in a high probability of nationalization. It's clearly not off the table yet.
Incidentally, I'd add one thing to Reilly's explanation of banks' capital structure:
An investor has to consider the totem pole-like ranking of claims on a bank's assets.
The safest place is atop the pole, a perch occupied by senior debt holders. Just underneath are owners of unsecured debt, often bonds.
Lower down the pole comes equity. First is preferred stock, which has a set face value and pays a fixed dividend. At the very bottom are common stockholders who shoulder the most risk, especially from any government action.
There's an important group of claimants missing here: the depositors, who rank in between the senior debt holders and the unsecured debt; for a bank like Citi, there are hundreds of billions of dollars in deposits which need to be covered in full before any bondholders get a penny. The more depositors a bank has, the more precarious the situation of anybody below them in the capital structure. Which includes, of course, the trust preferreds.
Comments
If you are commenting using a Facebook account, your profile information may be displayed with your comment depending on your privacy settings. By leaving the 'Post to Facebook' box selected, your comment will be published to your Facebook profile in addition to the space below.





