Recent Blog Posts
-
The Times' Rorshach Geithner Story
Apr 27 20099:04am EDT -
Sinking Animal Spirits
Apr 27 20098:04am EDT -
Counter-cyclical Urban Policy
Apr 26 200910:04am EDT -
Be Your Own Counterfeiter
Apr 26 20099:04am EDT -
Being Tim Geithner
Apr 25 200912:04pm EDT -
Notes From a Press Conference Naif
Apr 25 20099:04am EDT -
What Good is the News?
Apr 25 20098:04am EDT -
Stressful Enough
Apr 24 20092:04pm EDT -
Not Regretting the Pound
Apr 24 20091:04pm EDT -
Introducing the New Ford Squeeze
Apr 24 20099:04am EDT -
Non-Economic Questions of the Day
Apr 24 20099:04am EDT -
The Stress Test Blind Alley
Apr 24 20098:04am EDT -
Happy Hour
Apr 23 20099:04pm EDT -
Recovery Without Rebalancing
Apr 23 20096:04pm EDT -
The Shape of Your Recession
Apr 23 20095:04pm EDT
Links
- Felix Salmon

- DealBreaker

- Ryan Avent: The Bellows

- The Epicurean Dealmaker

- Chris Anderson

- Ultimi Barbarorum

- MarketBeat

- Michelle Leder

- John Quiggin

- The Panelist

- Andrew Leonard

- Streetsblog

- Brad Setser

- Michael Mandel

- Financial Crookery

- Kash Mansori

- Dean Baker

- Calculated Risk

- Free Exchange

- Curbed

- Lance Knobel

- Econospeak

- Carbon Tax Center

- Overcoming Bias

- Mark Thoma

- Naked Capitalism

- Alphaville

- Barry Ritholtz

- Alexander Campbell

- The Bayesian Heresy

- Brad DeLong

- DealBook

- Greg Mankiw

- Deal Journal

- FP Passport

- Carl Bialik

- Marginal Revolution

- A Fistful of Euros

- Dan Gross

Stanford: Criminal Charges Almost Certain
The SEC case against Allen Stanford comprises little more, right now, than a civil complaint; more private cases are now being filed. What does this mean for Stanford himself? Is he subject to arrest anywhere in the world? I asked Michael Gurland, a former federal prosecutor who's now at Neal Gerber Eisenberg, about what happens now.
Gurland told me that criminial charges are probably on their way: "The allegations on their face support criminal mail and wire fraud charges. I would assume there's an ongoing FBI investigation. The likelihood that he's going to be indicted are extraordinarily high." But that indictment doesn't need to be made public unless and until he's found and the US authorities start trying to extradite him from wherever he's turned up.
Given that there's still no indication of Stanford's whereabouts, the presumption is now that he's a fugitive, and that he's trying to place himself in a country which doesn't have good extradition relations with the US. Meanwhile, all of Stanford's creditors and investors, and certainly anybody who bought a CD from Stanford International Bank in Antigua, are going to have to look to the court in Texas if they want to get any of their money bank. Going to a branch in Antigua or Venezuela or Mexico -- or any branch at all, really -- isn't going to do them any good.
Gurland also explained to me that SIB's location in Antigua would have hugely complicated the SEC investigation: a large part of Stanford's operations were simply outside the SEC's jurisdiction. Maybe that explains why the investigation went on so long.
Meanwhile, Bloomberg's Alison Fitzgerald is reporting that the SEC investigation really went into full overdrive only last week, when Stanford's lawyer, Thomas Sjoblom of Proskauer Rose, suddenly "stepped down" from his role. Details are sparse, but Sjoblom's decision to stop representing Stanford would seem to have coincided with the release of press reports that SIB looked like a Ponzi scheme; presumably, up until that point, Sjoblom had been cooperating with the SEC and other authorities.
In any case, Stanford doesn't need a civil lawyer right now, he needs a criminal defense lawyer. Or, more to the point, he just needs someone who can help set up a new life for him as far removed as possible from any extradition threats. I suspect he's found such a person already.






