BizJournals Portfolio
Feb 17 2009 9:34am EDT

Stanford vs Citi

Comment of the day comes from John Slater:

You've had some interesting posts on Stanford. It appears that they have taken deposits to acquire trading/speculative assets. Not sure that what the big trading banks have done is all that different in the end.

It's a good point. Of course, the big trading banks do make loans. But they're just as prone to excess and sports sponsorships as Stanford. And they can lose more money in a quarter than Stanford International Bank has as its entire deposit base. But hey, at least their depositors have FDIC insurance, which means that you, the US taxpayer, are guaranteeing they'll get their money back. Thanks!

. □


Comments

If you are commenting using a Facebook account, your profile information may be displayed with your comment depending on your privacy settings. By leaving the 'Post to Facebook' box selected, your comment will be published to your Facebook profile in addition to the space below.


Connect With Portfolio.com

Come on, like us—you know you want to.

Follow us and if you're an innovative entrepreneur, we'll return the favor.

Today's top stories, conversation starters, and the back nine business bites.

spotlight on

Slideshows

500 Startups Hits New York

Dave McClure's brainchild makes its way to New York and introduces East Coast money folks to some intriguing new companies. View Slideshow