Recent Blog Posts
-
The Times' Rorshach Geithner Story
Apr 27 20099:26 am EDT -
Sinking Animal Spirits
Apr 27 20098:45 am EDT -
Counter-cyclical Urban Policy
Apr 26 200910:00 am EDT -
Be Your Own Counterfeiter
Apr 26 20099:36 am EDT -
Being Tim Geithner
Apr 25 200912:37 pm EDT -
Notes From a Press Conference Naif
Apr 25 20099:41 am EDT -
What Good is the News?
Apr 25 20098:32 am EDT -
Stressful Enough
Apr 24 20092:29 pm EDT -
Not Regretting the Pound
Apr 24 20091:09 pm EDT -
Introducing the New Ford Squeeze
Apr 24 20099:47 am EDT
Links
- Felix Salmon

- DealBreaker

- Ryan Avent: The Bellows

- The Epicurean Dealmaker

- Chris Anderson

- Ultimi Barbarorum

- MarketBeat

- Michelle Leder

- John Quiggin

- The Panelist

- Andrew Leonard

- Streetsblog

- Brad Setser

- Michael Mandel

- Financial Crookery

- Kash Mansori

- Dean Baker

- Calculated Risk

- Free Exchange

- Curbed

- Lance Knobel

- Econospeak

- Carbon Tax Center

- Overcoming Bias

- Mark Thoma

- Naked Capitalism

- Alphaville

- Barry Ritholtz

- Alexander Campbell

- The Bayesian Heresy

- Brad DeLong

- DealBook

- Greg Mankiw

- Deal Journal

- FP Passport

- Carl Bialik

- Marginal Revolution

- A Fistful of Euros

- Dan Gross

Stanford's Self-Incriminating Memo
Memo to Allen Stanford: Be careful what you write in memos, because they leak. Bloomberg's Alison Fitzgerald has her hands on his latest missive to employees:
R. Allen Stanford, the billionaire chairman of Houston-based investment firm Stanford Group Co., said he will "fight with every breath to continue to uphold our good name" in the face of investigations by U.S. securities regulators.
"We are all aware that former disgruntled employees have gone to the regulators questioning our work and our processes," Stanford said today in an e-mail to staff members that was obtained by Bloomberg News. "This could have compounded an otherwise routine examination."
"On the issue of Stanford International Bank, I want to be very clear," Stanford said in the e-mail. "SIB remains a strong institution, and even without the benefit of billions in U.S. taxpayers' dollars we are taking a number of decisive steps to reinforce our financial strength. We will take the necessary actions to protect our depositors."
This is all very fishy. Here's what one would expect Stanford to be saying and doing if he was entirely kosher: he would be welcoming the SEC and Finra investigations, and promising to cooperate fully with them. He would be talking openly to the press about why a billionaire needs to borrow money at 7.5% and how exactly he'd managed to get such spectacular returns. He would be wheeling out two gruntled former employees for every disgruntled one. And he would immediately replace his now-deceased auditor with a respectable international firm.
What would he not do? Well, vow to "fight", for one: who, exactly, does he think he's fighting? He wouldn't talk about "protecting" his depositors: protect them from what? According to his official accounts, Stanford International Bank was profitable last year, and that's all the "protection" they need. And, of course, he wouldn't fail to return money to depositors who ask for it, as I've heard tell has already started to happen.
Say what you like about Bernie Madoff, he knew when the gig was up and didn't try to hide it. Since the truth about SIB is going to come out sooner rather than later anyway, Stanford should just open up and tell us all what's been going on himself.
Comments
If you are commenting using a Facebook account, your profile information may be displayed with your comment depending on your privacy settings. By leaving the 'Post to Facebook' box selected, your comment will be published to your Facebook profile in addition to the space below.





