Recent Blog Posts
-
The Times' Rorshach Geithner Story
Apr 27 20099:04am EDT -
Sinking Animal Spirits
Apr 27 20098:04am EDT -
Counter-cyclical Urban Policy
Apr 26 200910:04am EDT -
Be Your Own Counterfeiter
Apr 26 20099:04am EDT -
Being Tim Geithner
Apr 25 200912:04pm EDT -
Notes From a Press Conference Naif
Apr 25 20099:04am EDT -
What Good is the News?
Apr 25 20098:04am EDT -
Stressful Enough
Apr 24 20092:04pm EDT -
Not Regretting the Pound
Apr 24 20091:04pm EDT -
Introducing the New Ford Squeeze
Apr 24 20099:04am EDT -
Non-Economic Questions of the Day
Apr 24 20099:04am EDT -
The Stress Test Blind Alley
Apr 24 20098:04am EDT -
Happy Hour
Apr 23 20099:04pm EDT -
Recovery Without Rebalancing
Apr 23 20096:04pm EDT -
The Shape of Your Recession
Apr 23 20095:04pm EDT
Links
- Felix Salmon

- DealBreaker

- Ryan Avent: The Bellows

- The Epicurean Dealmaker

- Chris Anderson

- Ultimi Barbarorum

- MarketBeat

- Michelle Leder

- John Quiggin

- The Panelist

- Andrew Leonard

- Streetsblog

- Brad Setser

- Michael Mandel

- Financial Crookery

- Kash Mansori

- Dean Baker

- Calculated Risk

- Free Exchange

- Curbed

- Lance Knobel

- Econospeak

- Carbon Tax Center

- Overcoming Bias

- Mark Thoma

- Naked Capitalism

- Alphaville

- Barry Ritholtz

- Alexander Campbell

- The Bayesian Heresy

- Brad DeLong

- DealBook

- Greg Mankiw

- Deal Journal

- FP Passport

- Carl Bialik

- Marginal Revolution

- A Fistful of Euros

- Dan Gross

Treasury's $78 Billion TARP Giveaway
The Congressional Oversight Panel is certainly doing its job of double-checking TARP expenditures and Treasury statements. Here's a bit of its latest report, which accuses Treasury of overpaying for assets to the tune of $78 billion:
Valuation of the transactions is critical because then-Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson assured the public that the investments of TARP money were sound, given in return for full value: "This is an investment, not an expenditure, and there is no reason to expect this program will cost taxpayers anything." In December, he reiterated the point, "When measured on an accrual basis, the value of the preferred stock is at or near par." This means, in effect, that for every $100 Treasury invested in these companies, it received stock and warrants valued at about $100.
As discussed in greater detail in the remainder of this section, an extensive valuation analysis of the ten transactions that was commissioned by the Panel concluded that:
- In the eight transactions which were made under the investment program for healthy banks, for each $100 spent, Treasury received assets worth approximately $78.
- In the two transactions which were made under programs for riskier banks, for each $100 spent, the Treasury received assets worth approximately $41.
- Overall, in the ten transactions, for each $100 spent, the Treasury received assets worth approximately $66.
Meanwhile, other capital providers were driving much harder bargains:
- For each $100 Berkshire Hathaway invested in Goldman Sachs, it received securities with a fair market value of $110.
- For each $100 Qatar Holding and Abu Dhabi invested in Barclays, they received securities with a fair market value of $123.
- For each $100 Mitsubishi invested in Morgan Stanley, it received securities with a fair market value of $102.
If Treasury wants to overpay for bad assets, in order to recapitalize the banking system, then it should do so transparently. What's unforgivable is lying, and saying that you're paying a fair price when you're not.






