Recent Blog Posts
-
The Times' Rorshach Geithner Story
Apr 27 20099:26 am EDT -
Sinking Animal Spirits
Apr 27 20098:45 am EDT -
Counter-cyclical Urban Policy
Apr 26 200910:00 am EDT -
Be Your Own Counterfeiter
Apr 26 20099:36 am EDT -
Being Tim Geithner
Apr 25 200912:37 pm EDT -
Notes From a Press Conference Naif
Apr 25 20099:41 am EDT -
What Good is the News?
Apr 25 20098:32 am EDT -
Stressful Enough
Apr 24 20092:29 pm EDT -
Not Regretting the Pound
Apr 24 20091:09 pm EDT -
Introducing the New Ford Squeeze
Apr 24 20099:47 am EDT
Links
- Felix Salmon

- DealBreaker

- Ryan Avent: The Bellows

- The Epicurean Dealmaker

- Chris Anderson

- Ultimi Barbarorum

- MarketBeat

- Michelle Leder

- John Quiggin

- The Panelist

- Andrew Leonard

- Streetsblog

- Brad Setser

- Michael Mandel

- Financial Crookery

- Kash Mansori

- Dean Baker

- Calculated Risk

- Free Exchange

- Curbed

- Lance Knobel

- Econospeak

- Carbon Tax Center

- Overcoming Bias

- Mark Thoma

- Naked Capitalism

- Alphaville

- Barry Ritholtz

- Alexander Campbell

- The Bayesian Heresy

- Brad DeLong

- DealBook

- Greg Mankiw

- Deal Journal

- FP Passport

- Carl Bialik

- Marginal Revolution

- A Fistful of Euros

- Dan Gross

TARP Datapoint of the Day
The CBO has done the hard work of marking to market all the assets purchased with TARP funds, including preferred stock in various banks. It concludes that today's mark-to-market value of the $247 billion spent in 2008 is just $183 billion, and that the government essentially used the TARP to subsidize the US financial system to the tune of $64 billion last year. This table comes from the full report:
This table gives the best indication yet of where Treasury's subsidies are really going. The recapitalizations account for half the total subsidy, but in a sense they're cheap -- a subsidy rate of just 18% -- since they're 72% of the total outlays.
In contrast, the $20 billion of emergency funds which went to Citigroup constituted a government giveaway of $5 billion -- a 26% subsidy rate. And the subsidies for AIG (53%) and the auto sector, including GMAC (63%) were higher still.
I would very much like to be able to see the breakdown of the subsidies within the capital purcahse program -- presumably the subsidies to strong banks are much lower than the subsidies to weak banks, but it would be great to see them itemized.
I look forward to Treasury telling us, before it spends any more TARP funds, what kind of subsidy rate it considers acceptable. There's a total of $453 billion in TARP funds not spent in 2008; if those too have a subsidy rate of 26%, that's equivalent to government expenditure of another $118 billion. To put that number in perspective, the market capitalization of Citigroup and Bank of America combined is just $55 billion. Isn't it about time we just nationalized them?
Comments
If you are commenting using a Facebook account, your profile information may be displayed with your comment depending on your privacy settings. By leaving the 'Post to Facebook' box selected, your comment will be published to your Facebook profile in addition to the space below.





