Recent Blog Posts
-
The $4.5 Billion Dollar Bank Run
Nov 07 201111:20 am EDT -
The Times' Rorshach Geithner Story
Apr 27 20099:26 am EDT -
Sinking Animal Spirits
Apr 27 20098:45 am EDT -
Counter-cyclical Urban Policy
Apr 26 200910:00 am EDT -
Be Your Own Counterfeiter
Apr 26 20099:36 am EDT -
Being Tim Geithner
Apr 25 200912:37 pm EDT -
Notes From a Press Conference Naif
Apr 25 20099:41 am EDT -
What Good is the News?
Apr 25 20098:32 am EDT -
Stressful Enough
Apr 24 20092:29 pm EDT -
Not Regretting the Pound
Apr 24 20091:09 pm EDT
Links
- Felix Salmon

- DealBreaker

- Ryan Avent: The Bellows

- The Epicurean Dealmaker

- Chris Anderson

- Ultimi Barbarorum

- MarketBeat

- Michelle Leder

- John Quiggin

- The Panelist

- Andrew Leonard

- Streetsblog

- Brad Setser

- Michael Mandel

- Financial Crookery

- Kash Mansori

- Dean Baker

- Calculated Risk

- Free Exchange

- Curbed

- Lance Knobel

- Econospeak

- Carbon Tax Center

- Overcoming Bias

- Mark Thoma

- Naked Capitalism

- Alphaville

- Barry Ritholtz

- Alexander Campbell

- The Bayesian Heresy

- Brad DeLong

- DealBook

- Greg Mankiw

- Deal Journal

- FP Passport

- Carl Bialik

- Marginal Revolution

- A Fistful of Euros

- Dan Gross

Merrill Lynch Datapoint of the Day
This comes from Heidi Moore's excellent round-up of today's BofA/Merrill news, which included the astonishing figure that Merrill Lynch managed to lose $15 billion in the fourth quarter.
"To put [the] $15 bn after-tax [loss] in perspective, 60% of the common equity base of the company was lost in one quarter," Goldman Sachs research analysts noted wryly in a research report this morning.
For all the talk about these losses, it's still a bit unclear how they suddenly sideswiped everybody in December. On this morning's conference call, BofA CEO Ken Lewis was asked about this, and replied:
Yes, in a nutshell, much, much higher deterioration of the assets we had identified than we had expected, going into the fourth quarter. So our forecast of losses, Merrill Lynch's forecast of losses and, frankly, I would think most anybody in the capital-markets business would have forecasted a lower loss rate than what we saw, so it wasn't an issue of not identifying the assets. It was that we did not expect the significant deterioration which happened in mid- to late December that we saw.
I, for one, still don't understand what happened in mid-to-late December. The stock market was flat, the fixed-income market was uneventful: how, then, did Merrill's balance sheet suddenly blow up so spectacularly? Had Merrill managers been hiding those losses for a long time, only to decide to recognize them when the firm had only a couple of weeks to live in any case?
There are other questions, too: How can a black hole of that magnitude not be picked up by a due-diligence process? And how can Ken Lewis seriously expect to keep his job after this massive blunder? I think he thinks he's some kind of mensch, saving the entire banking system from the risks associated with the merger falling through and Merrill being allowed to fai. Essentially, on this view, Bank of America's shareholders are bailing out the rest of the country. But that's not something they ever volunteered to do, and they'd be well within their rights to kick Lewis out at this point.
Comments
If you are commenting using a Facebook account, your profile information may be displayed with your comment depending on your privacy settings. By leaving the 'Post to Facebook' box selected, your comment will be published to your Facebook profile in addition to the space below.




