Recent Blog Posts
-
The Times' Rorshach Geithner Story
Apr 27 20099:26 am EDT -
Sinking Animal Spirits
Apr 27 20098:45 am EDT -
Counter-cyclical Urban Policy
Apr 26 200910:00 am EDT -
Be Your Own Counterfeiter
Apr 26 20099:36 am EDT -
Being Tim Geithner
Apr 25 200912:37 pm EDT -
Notes From a Press Conference Naif
Apr 25 20099:41 am EDT -
What Good is the News?
Apr 25 20098:32 am EDT -
Stressful Enough
Apr 24 20092:29 pm EDT -
Not Regretting the Pound
Apr 24 20091:09 pm EDT -
Introducing the New Ford Squeeze
Apr 24 20099:47 am EDT
Links
- Felix Salmon

- DealBreaker

- Ryan Avent: The Bellows

- The Epicurean Dealmaker

- Chris Anderson

- Ultimi Barbarorum

- MarketBeat

- Michelle Leder

- John Quiggin

- The Panelist

- Andrew Leonard

- Streetsblog

- Brad Setser

- Michael Mandel

- Financial Crookery

- Kash Mansori

- Dean Baker

- Calculated Risk

- Free Exchange

- Curbed

- Lance Knobel

- Econospeak

- Carbon Tax Center

- Overcoming Bias

- Mark Thoma

- Naked Capitalism

- Alphaville

- Barry Ritholtz

- Alexander Campbell

- The Bayesian Heresy

- Brad DeLong

- DealBook

- Greg Mankiw

- Deal Journal

- FP Passport

- Carl Bialik

- Marginal Revolution

- A Fistful of Euros

- Dan Gross

From Citigroup to Citicorp
David Enrich says that the new big idea over at Citigroup is "to focus on wholesale banking for large corporate clients and retail banking for customers in selected markets around the world". If that ever happens, I have the perfect name for the new entity: Citicorp. It could even do a lot worse than to re-hire John Reed as its CEO; at least he has a proven ability to run such a thing.
The problem, of course, is how on earth to get there from here. No one has any particular interest in buying the other disparate elements of Citigroup, from Primerica to the credit-card operations and the investment bank, and it might be easier, quicker, and more elegant to simply spin them off to shareholders as standalone operations unburdened with much if any debt.
But that would imply that rump Citi -- Citicorp -- would be the "bad bank", rather than everything else, which seems to be the present idea.
If you are going to create a bad bank, though, putting the dodgy assets in Citicorp seems to me to be much more sensible than trying to attach them to anything else. After all, Citicorp was insolvent once before, during the debt crisis of the 1980s, and it managed to emerge from that crisis, thanks partly to Reed's leadership. Maybe he could manage the the same feat again.
Comments
If you are commenting using a Facebook account, your profile information may be displayed with your comment depending on your privacy settings. By leaving the 'Post to Facebook' box selected, your comment will be published to your Facebook profile in addition to the space below.





