Recent Blog Posts
-
The $4.5 Billion Dollar Bank Run
Nov 07 201111:20 am EDT -
The Times' Rorshach Geithner Story
Apr 27 20099:26 am EDT -
Sinking Animal Spirits
Apr 27 20098:45 am EDT -
Counter-cyclical Urban Policy
Apr 26 200910:00 am EDT -
Be Your Own Counterfeiter
Apr 26 20099:36 am EDT -
Being Tim Geithner
Apr 25 200912:37 pm EDT -
Notes From a Press Conference Naif
Apr 25 20099:41 am EDT -
What Good is the News?
Apr 25 20098:32 am EDT -
Stressful Enough
Apr 24 20092:29 pm EDT -
Not Regretting the Pound
Apr 24 20091:09 pm EDT
Links
- Felix Salmon

- DealBreaker

- Ryan Avent: The Bellows

- The Epicurean Dealmaker

- Chris Anderson

- Ultimi Barbarorum

- MarketBeat

- Michelle Leder

- John Quiggin

- The Panelist

- Andrew Leonard

- Streetsblog

- Brad Setser

- Michael Mandel

- Financial Crookery

- Kash Mansori

- Dean Baker

- Calculated Risk

- Free Exchange

- Curbed

- Lance Knobel

- Econospeak

- Carbon Tax Center

- Overcoming Bias

- Mark Thoma

- Naked Capitalism

- Alphaville

- Barry Ritholtz

- Alexander Campbell

- The Bayesian Heresy

- Brad DeLong

- DealBook

- Greg Mankiw

- Deal Journal

- FP Passport

- Carl Bialik

- Marginal Revolution

- A Fistful of Euros

- Dan Gross

Singapore's Outperforming Merrill Investment
The FT says today that the government of Singapore's $23-a-share investment in Merrill Lynch was worth just $12.10 per share at the end of 2008, a drop of 47%. A paper loss of more than $2 billion is tough for any investor to swallow, but for a stake in an investment bank bought at the end of 2007, this is actually an impressive outperformance.
Obviously, a stake in Bear Stearns or Lehman would be worth much less. But look at Morgan Stanley, which fell from $53.11 to $16.04 during the course of 2008, a fall of 70%. Even Goldman Sachs fell from $215.05 to $84.39: a fall of 61%.
What's more, it's unclear where the $12.10 figure comes from: as the NYT notes, Merrill shares actually closed at $15.83 apiece on the last day of the year. Which would put Singapore's Merrill loss at 31%, significantly outperforming the S&P 500.
So yes, Singapore lost money on its Merrill deal. But in the annals of bad banking investments, this one's quite a small mistake, in comparison to say Texas Pacific's recapitalization of Washington Mutual.
Comments
If you are commenting using a Facebook account, your profile information may be displayed with your comment depending on your privacy settings. By leaving the 'Post to Facebook' box selected, your comment will be published to your Facebook profile in addition to the space below.




