Recent Blog Posts
-
The Times' Rorshach Geithner Story
Apr 27 20099:04am EDT -
Sinking Animal Spirits
Apr 27 20098:04am EDT -
Counter-cyclical Urban Policy
Apr 26 200910:04am EDT -
Be Your Own Counterfeiter
Apr 26 20099:04am EDT -
Being Tim Geithner
Apr 25 200912:04pm EDT -
Notes From a Press Conference Naif
Apr 25 20099:04am EDT -
What Good is the News?
Apr 25 20098:04am EDT -
Stressful Enough
Apr 24 20092:04pm EDT -
Not Regretting the Pound
Apr 24 20091:04pm EDT -
Introducing the New Ford Squeeze
Apr 24 20099:04am EDT -
Non-Economic Questions of the Day
Apr 24 20099:04am EDT -
The Stress Test Blind Alley
Apr 24 20098:04am EDT -
Happy Hour
Apr 23 20099:04pm EDT -
Recovery Without Rebalancing
Apr 23 20096:04pm EDT -
The Shape of Your Recession
Apr 23 20095:04pm EDT
Links
- Felix Salmon

- DealBreaker

- Ryan Avent: The Bellows

- The Epicurean Dealmaker

- Chris Anderson

- Ultimi Barbarorum

- MarketBeat

- Michelle Leder

- John Quiggin

- The Panelist

- Andrew Leonard

- Streetsblog

- Brad Setser

- Michael Mandel

- Financial Crookery

- Kash Mansori

- Dean Baker

- Calculated Risk

- Free Exchange

- Curbed

- Lance Knobel

- Econospeak

- Carbon Tax Center

- Overcoming Bias

- Mark Thoma

- Naked Capitalism

- Alphaville

- Barry Ritholtz

- Alexander Campbell

- The Bayesian Heresy

- Brad DeLong

- DealBook

- Greg Mankiw

- Deal Journal

- FP Passport

- Carl Bialik

- Marginal Revolution

- A Fistful of Euros

- Dan Gross

Obama's Big Speech
I agree with pretty much everything in Barack Obama's big speech today about his stimulus plan. And not (just) because I'm some kind of lefty: Alex Tabarrok feels much the same way, as does Evan Newmark. It's necessarily vague, but it points in all the right directions. So I wonder why Obama felt compelled to quantify this:
That work begins with this plan - a plan I am confident will save or create at least three million jobs over the next few years.
It doesn't really mean anything: "next few years" is vague enough to start with, but if you're including jobs "saved" rather than created, then there's no way of even counting, since there's no way of knowing how many jobs would be lost had the plan not been implemented.
That said, I think the emphasis on jobs is an eminently sensible one, and I hope to have some numbers later backing up my assertion that the best bang for your buck, if you're wanting to create jobs, is to spend money in the arts. There was nothing about the arts in Obama's speech, but I still hold out hope. It's hard to show that arts spending "works" in the kind of ROI sense that's implied in Obama's speech, since many of the returns on arts spending are non-financial. But that doesn't make them any less important.






