Recent Blog Posts
-
The Times' Rorshach Geithner Story
Apr 27 20099:04am EDT -
Sinking Animal Spirits
Apr 27 20098:04am EDT -
Counter-cyclical Urban Policy
Apr 26 200910:04am EDT -
Be Your Own Counterfeiter
Apr 26 20099:04am EDT -
Being Tim Geithner
Apr 25 200912:04pm EDT -
Notes From a Press Conference Naif
Apr 25 20099:04am EDT -
What Good is the News?
Apr 25 20098:04am EDT -
Stressful Enough
Apr 24 20092:04pm EDT -
Not Regretting the Pound
Apr 24 20091:04pm EDT -
Introducing the New Ford Squeeze
Apr 24 20099:04am EDT -
Non-Economic Questions of the Day
Apr 24 20099:04am EDT -
The Stress Test Blind Alley
Apr 24 20098:04am EDT -
Happy Hour
Apr 23 20099:04pm EDT -
Recovery Without Rebalancing
Apr 23 20096:04pm EDT -
The Shape of Your Recession
Apr 23 20095:04pm EDT
Links
- Felix Salmon
- DealBreaker
- Ryan Avent: The Bellows
- The Epicurean Dealmaker
- Chris Anderson
- Ultimi Barbarorum
- MarketBeat
- Michelle Leder
- John Quiggin
- The Panelist
- Andrew Leonard
- Streetsblog
- Brad Setser
- Michael Mandel
- Financial Crookery
- Kash Mansori
- Dean Baker
- Calculated Risk
- Free Exchange
- Curbed
- Lance Knobel
- Econospeak
- Carbon Tax Center
- Overcoming Bias
- Mark Thoma
- Naked Capitalism
- Alphaville
- Barry Ritholtz
- Alexander Campbell
- The Bayesian Heresy
- Brad DeLong
- DealBook
- Greg Mankiw
- Deal Journal
- FP Passport
- Carl Bialik
- Marginal Revolution
- A Fistful of Euros
- Dan Gross
More Evaporating Billions at Morgan Stanley
Morgan Stanley's earnings this morning are truly dreadful. When your stock is trading around $15 a share, a quarterly loss of $2.24 per share is a big deal. But in fact it's worse than that: the bank recorded "net revenue of $2.7 billion from the widening of Morgan Stanley's credit spreads". That's entirely legitimate from an accountancy perspective, but those aren't the kind of earnings any bank wants. Take them away, and the quarterly loss becomes $5 a share. Ouch.
Yet the stock is down only 60 cents as I write this, at about $15.50 a share -- it closed below $14 on Monday, and somehow the combination of Goldman's earnings and the Fed's rate cut have managed to save the day for Stanley.
It is worth noting that the analysts completely whiffed this one:
The average estimate of 16 analysts surveyed by Bloomberg was for a 34-cent loss, with no estimates exceeding $1.15.
Lucky no one listens to them.
On the other hand, Morgan Stanley does seem to be further along than Goldman Sachs in its deleveraging process: its balance sheet has shrunk by a third in the past three months, to just $658 billion. That compares to a decline of 18% at Goldman, to $885 billion. No one knows where either bank will end up, but John Mack seems to have grasped the nettle earlier and harder than Lloyd Blankfein. Maybe that's why his stock isn't falling further this morning: it's fallen so far already.
