Recent Blog Posts
-
The Times' Rorshach Geithner Story
Apr 27 20099:04am EDT -
Sinking Animal Spirits
Apr 27 20098:04am EDT -
Counter-cyclical Urban Policy
Apr 26 200910:04am EDT -
Be Your Own Counterfeiter
Apr 26 20099:04am EDT -
Being Tim Geithner
Apr 25 200912:04pm EDT -
Notes From a Press Conference Naif
Apr 25 20099:04am EDT -
What Good is the News?
Apr 25 20098:04am EDT -
Stressful Enough
Apr 24 20092:04pm EDT -
Not Regretting the Pound
Apr 24 20091:04pm EDT -
Introducing the New Ford Squeeze
Apr 24 20099:04am EDT -
Non-Economic Questions of the Day
Apr 24 20099:04am EDT -
The Stress Test Blind Alley
Apr 24 20098:04am EDT -
Happy Hour
Apr 23 20099:04pm EDT -
Recovery Without Rebalancing
Apr 23 20096:04pm EDT -
The Shape of Your Recession
Apr 23 20095:04pm EDT
Links
- Felix Salmon

- DealBreaker

- Ryan Avent: The Bellows

- The Epicurean Dealmaker

- Chris Anderson

- Ultimi Barbarorum

- MarketBeat

- Michelle Leder

- John Quiggin

- The Panelist

- Andrew Leonard

- Streetsblog

- Brad Setser

- Michael Mandel

- Financial Crookery

- Kash Mansori

- Dean Baker

- Calculated Risk

- Free Exchange

- Curbed

- Lance Knobel

- Econospeak

- Carbon Tax Center

- Overcoming Bias

- Mark Thoma

- Naked Capitalism

- Alphaville

- Barry Ritholtz

- Alexander Campbell

- The Bayesian Heresy

- Brad DeLong

- DealBook

- Greg Mankiw

- Deal Journal

- FP Passport

- Carl Bialik

- Marginal Revolution

- A Fistful of Euros

- Dan Gross

Can Hedge Funds Be Fraudulent?
I'll be on NPR's Planet Money podcast today, trying my best to explain what a hedge fund is. As John Gapper says, it's crucial to understand that Bernie Madoff did not have a hedge fund, and that hedge funds tend to have prime brokers, which act as an extra pair of eyes and help to prevent outright fraud of the Madoff variety.
On the other hand, there's no shortage of hedge funds which invested in Madoff's fund. Fairfield Sentry was one of them, and its investors are unlikely to be particularly mollified by the fact that Fairfield Sentry was not itself fraudulent: it sent their money off to Bernie Madoff just it said it would.
In fact, the involvement of Fairfield Sentry as a middleman almost certainly made things worse for investors. Not only did they need to pay Fairfield Sentry's fees; they might also have felt reassured by the fact that Fairfield had independent auditors and other common indicia of trustworthiness.
Similarly, in England, people who neither knew nor trusted Bernie Madoff -- people, indeed, who had never heard of the man -- were happy handing over their money to Nicola Horlick's Bramdean. They trusted her, and Bernie managed to piggyback on that trust.
Which goes to show that people who invest in hedge funds should always ask questions about where and how that hedge fund is investing their money. There's not much difference between investing in a black-box fund like Madoff's, on the one hand, and investing in a transparent fund like Fairfield Sentry, on the other, if that entirely transparent fund is only transparent until it reaches Madoff's doors.
Of course, it's not quite as simple as all that: Madoff would construct elaborate and fictional trading statements detailing, ex post, how his returns were achieved. There was an illusion of transparency; he didn't simply tell his investors that he had a black box and they could know no more.
But it's worth tweaking Gapper's point just a little bit: yes, if you're investing your money with a hedge fund which does its own investing, you can have quite a lot of faith it isn't an outright fraud. (Although fraudulent hedge funds, like Bayou, do exist.) But if you're investing with a hedge fund or a fund-of-funds which outsources its investing, you can have no such peace of mind. As Michael de la Merced says, the Madoff affair can -- and should -- erode confidence in hedge funds generally, even if Madoff himself was not technically a hedge-fund manager.






