Recent Blog Posts
-
The Times' Rorshach Geithner Story
Apr 27 20099:26 am EDT -
Sinking Animal Spirits
Apr 27 20098:45 am EDT -
Counter-cyclical Urban Policy
Apr 26 200910:00 am EDT -
Be Your Own Counterfeiter
Apr 26 20099:36 am EDT -
Being Tim Geithner
Apr 25 200912:37 pm EDT -
Notes From a Press Conference Naif
Apr 25 20099:41 am EDT -
What Good is the News?
Apr 25 20098:32 am EDT -
Stressful Enough
Apr 24 20092:29 pm EDT -
Not Regretting the Pound
Apr 24 20091:09 pm EDT -
Introducing the New Ford Squeeze
Apr 24 20099:47 am EDT
Links
- Felix Salmon

- DealBreaker

- Ryan Avent: The Bellows

- The Epicurean Dealmaker

- Chris Anderson

- Ultimi Barbarorum

- MarketBeat

- Michelle Leder

- John Quiggin

- The Panelist

- Andrew Leonard

- Streetsblog

- Brad Setser

- Michael Mandel

- Financial Crookery

- Kash Mansori

- Dean Baker

- Calculated Risk

- Free Exchange

- Curbed

- Lance Knobel

- Econospeak

- Carbon Tax Center

- Overcoming Bias

- Mark Thoma

- Naked Capitalism

- Alphaville

- Barry Ritholtz

- Alexander Campbell

- The Bayesian Heresy

- Brad DeLong

- DealBook

- Greg Mankiw

- Deal Journal

- FP Passport

- Carl Bialik

- Marginal Revolution

- A Fistful of Euros

- Dan Gross

Is Your Money Safe at Citibank?
The massive Wall Street rally this afternoon, and a statement in support of Citigroup's chairman, didn't help Citi, which closed down slightly on the day at $9.45 a share. Clearly the market is very worried about Citi's future, and the fact that it's trading in single digits -- which means that a modest $1 decline in the share price means headlines about a 10% plunge -- doesn't help.
But this is important: don't panic. Citi really is too big to fail, and its depositors are safe. Sprizouse is wrong when he says this:
The FDIC cannot protect all of CitiBank's depositors if the massive behemoth of bank goes under.
In fact, the FDIC can easily protect all of Citi's insured depositors. According to the FDIC, the combined total domestic deposits of Citigroup's insured subsidiaries was $266 billion as of June 30. Of that $219 billion was in the largest subsidiary, Citibank NA, and of that, just 40.58% was actually insured -- or about $89 billion.
Now that number will have gone up when the FDIC raised its insurance limit to $250,000 from $100,000, but even now I doubt that the total amount of money the FDIC is insuring at Citibank is much more than $100 billion. A lot of money? Yes. But not a huge amount by TARP standards, and easily within the abilities of the US government to cover.
Now, if you have uninsured deposits at Citibank -- and the vast majority of Citibank's $773 billion in deposits are uninsured, mostly because they're held outside the US -- then you might do well to wonder how safe those deposits really are. If even a large minority of those depositors ends up deciding to move their money elsewhere, then Citi, I'm pretty sure, is toast.
But for most individuals with checking accounts, CDs, and the like at Citibank, there's nothing to worry about, even if Citi fails. And the same is true for anybody with a brokerage account at Smith Barney. Your money is safe, you can sleep easily tonight.
Comments
If you are commenting using a Facebook account, your profile information may be displayed with your comment depending on your privacy settings. By leaving the 'Post to Facebook' box selected, your comment will be published to your Facebook profile in addition to the space below.





